Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jun 6;26(1):72.
doi: 10.1186/s12910-025-01237-x.

Navigating healthcare decision-making for children requiring life-sustaining medical treatment in Ireland: exploring clinician perspectives through the lens of the Irish legal system

Affiliations

Navigating healthcare decision-making for children requiring life-sustaining medical treatment in Ireland: exploring clinician perspectives through the lens of the Irish legal system

M Brenner et al. BMC Med Ethics. .

Abstract

Healthcare decision-making within the pediatric population is a complex area to navigate for clinicians, parents and/or legal guardians, and children, and is even more complicated when children require intensive life-sustaining medical treatment (LSMT). Literature has highlighted the key ethical and legal principles that clinicians involved in bioethics committees should follow when making complex clinical decisions for this population, however, it can be unclear exactly where and how these decisions are made in practice. This paper provides an insight into how healthcare decision-making for children requiring LSMT is navigated within the medical and legal environment in Ireland. It uses a unique methodology consisting of a combination of secondary qualitative analysis of interview data obtained from clinicians involved in bioethics committees, and an analysis of Irish case law. The results of this paper highlight how clinicians navigate bioethical pediatric healthcare decision-making in Ireland, in the context of decisions regarding LSMT. The findings illustrate the complex balancing act that clinicians face in recognising and respecting parental autonomy in shared decision-making whilst being responsible for medical care that prioritises the best interests of the child, particularly from a legal standpoint. In some instances, this creates a decisional discord, and further training and professional supports are needed within clinical practice to promote the needs of children and to reduce stakeholder conflict.

Keywords: Best interests of the child; Bioethics; Life-sustaining technology; Medical decision-making; Paediatrics; Rights of the child.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: Ethical approval was granted from the Health Sciences Faculty Health Research Review Board of the host institution, Trinity College Dublin (reference number: 190102) and the study was performed in line with all ethical guidelines, and with the European Union (EU) General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) requirements. Informed consent was obtained from all participants included in this study. The interview data used in this study has previously been published [24]. The study adhered to the Declaration of Helsinki. Consent for publication: All authors have consented to this publication. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

Similar articles

References

    1. Birchley G, Thomas-Unsworth S, Mellor C, Baquedano M, Ingle S, Fraser J. Factors affecting decision-making in children with complex care needs: a consensus approach to develop best practice in a UK children's hospital. BMJ Paediatrics Open. 2022;6(1). 10.1136/bmjpo-2022-001589. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Savell K. Confronting death in legal disputes about treatment-limitation in children. J Bioethical Inq. 2011;8(4):363–77. 10.1007/s11673-011-9335-x.
    1. Beacham BL, Deatrick JA. Health care autonomy in children with chronic conditions: implications for self-care and family management. Nurs Clin North Am. 2013;48(2):305–17. 10.1016/j.cnur.2013.01.010. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gold H, Hall G, Gillam L. Role and function of a paediatric clinical ethics service: experiences at the Royal Children’s Hospital, Melbourne. J Paediatr Child Health. 2011;47(9):632–6. 10.1111/j.1440-1754.2011.02171.x. - PubMed
    1. Racine E, Lariviere-Bastien D, Bell E, Majnemer A, Shevell M. Respect for autonomy in the healthcare context: observations from a qualitative study of young adults with cerebral palsy. Child Care Health Dev. 2013;39(6): 873–9. 10.1111/cch.12018. - PubMed