Navigating healthcare decision-making for children requiring life-sustaining medical treatment in Ireland: exploring clinician perspectives through the lens of the Irish legal system
- PMID: 40481514
- PMCID: PMC12144792
- DOI: 10.1186/s12910-025-01237-x
Navigating healthcare decision-making for children requiring life-sustaining medical treatment in Ireland: exploring clinician perspectives through the lens of the Irish legal system
Abstract
Healthcare decision-making within the pediatric population is a complex area to navigate for clinicians, parents and/or legal guardians, and children, and is even more complicated when children require intensive life-sustaining medical treatment (LSMT). Literature has highlighted the key ethical and legal principles that clinicians involved in bioethics committees should follow when making complex clinical decisions for this population, however, it can be unclear exactly where and how these decisions are made in practice. This paper provides an insight into how healthcare decision-making for children requiring LSMT is navigated within the medical and legal environment in Ireland. It uses a unique methodology consisting of a combination of secondary qualitative analysis of interview data obtained from clinicians involved in bioethics committees, and an analysis of Irish case law. The results of this paper highlight how clinicians navigate bioethical pediatric healthcare decision-making in Ireland, in the context of decisions regarding LSMT. The findings illustrate the complex balancing act that clinicians face in recognising and respecting parental autonomy in shared decision-making whilst being responsible for medical care that prioritises the best interests of the child, particularly from a legal standpoint. In some instances, this creates a decisional discord, and further training and professional supports are needed within clinical practice to promote the needs of children and to reduce stakeholder conflict.
Keywords: Best interests of the child; Bioethics; Life-sustaining technology; Medical decision-making; Paediatrics; Rights of the child.
© 2025. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: Ethical approval was granted from the Health Sciences Faculty Health Research Review Board of the host institution, Trinity College Dublin (reference number: 190102) and the study was performed in line with all ethical guidelines, and with the European Union (EU) General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) requirements. Informed consent was obtained from all participants included in this study. The interview data used in this study has previously been published [24]. The study adhered to the Declaration of Helsinki. Consent for publication: All authors have consented to this publication. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.
Similar articles
-
Healthcare professionals face ethical challenges in managing care for neurodevelopmental disorders: a qualitative study in Lebanon.BMJ Open. 2025 Jan 2;15(1):e082281. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-082281. BMJ Open. 2025. PMID: 39753261 Free PMC article.
-
The legal basis for ethical withholding and withdrawing of life-sustaining medical treatment in children.J Law Med. 2006 Nov;14(2):244-61. J Law Med. 2006. PMID: 17153529
-
Perspectives of Clinicians on Shared Decision Making in Pediatric CKD: A Qualitative Study.Am J Kidney Dis. 2022 Aug;80(2):241-250. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2021.12.009. Epub 2022 Jan 25. Am J Kidney Dis. 2022. PMID: 35085686
-
Withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining treatment in children.Paediatr Anaesth. 2009 Oct;19(10):972-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2009.03027.x. Paediatr Anaesth. 2009. PMID: 19754487 Review.
-
Shared decision-making in adolescent healthcare: a literature review of ethical considerations.Eur J Pediatr. 2024 Oct;183(10):4195-4203. doi: 10.1007/s00431-024-05687-0. Epub 2024 Aug 21. Eur J Pediatr. 2024. PMID: 39167164 Review.
References
-
- Savell K. Confronting death in legal disputes about treatment-limitation in children. J Bioethical Inq. 2011;8(4):363–77. 10.1007/s11673-011-9335-x.
-
- Gold H, Hall G, Gillam L. Role and function of a paediatric clinical ethics service: experiences at the Royal Children’s Hospital, Melbourne. J Paediatr Child Health. 2011;47(9):632–6. 10.1111/j.1440-1754.2011.02171.x. - PubMed
-
- Racine E, Lariviere-Bastien D, Bell E, Majnemer A, Shevell M. Respect for autonomy in the healthcare context: observations from a qualitative study of young adults with cerebral palsy. Child Care Health Dev. 2013;39(6): 873–9. 10.1111/cch.12018. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical