Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jun 6;26(1):200.
doi: 10.1186/s13063-025-08886-8.

The Research Visit of the Future: an academic-industry model for telehealth, electronic clinical outcomes assessments, and Decentralized Clinical Trials (DCTs)

Affiliations

The Research Visit of the Future: an academic-industry model for telehealth, electronic clinical outcomes assessments, and Decentralized Clinical Trials (DCTs)

Noah Goodson et al. Trials. .

Abstract

The COVID pandemic initially led to the unprecedented suspension of large numbers of clinical research studies and trials that required in-person study visits, highlighting the need to reevaluate how human participant research projects are conducted. During this time the University of Pittsburgh Clinical and Translational Science Institute (Pitt CTSI) embarked on a multi-year initiative to envision the Research Visit of the Future, which ultimately led to an academia-industry partnership that enables the scalable self-service model using a virtual clinical research platform for clinical studies at a major academic research institution. This model enables the flexible deployment of eConsent, Telehealth (audio/video) calls, synchronous and asynchronous data capture, integrated sensors and wearables, and patient engagement tools, all within a single participant-focused research platform. Academic investigators can configure their studies without custom coding across a wide range of study designs, including hybrid- and fully decentralized clinical trials. Here we present the journey to identifying the technology requirements to enrich data collection, structure of our partnership model, and considerations for crossing the digital divide to enable broader access to clinical research among diverse and under-represented communities.

Keywords: Decentralized clinical trials; Digital divide; Diversity; Inclusion; Telehealth.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Consent for publication: All authors have approved the manuscript for submission. We also confirm that the content of the manuscript has not been published nor is it under consideration for publication elsewhere. Competing interests: Authors NG and JW are employees of Thread, a decentralized clinical trials platform provider. Authors CW, SR, and MM are employees of the University of Pittsburgh and work directly with or for the University of Pittsburgh Clinical and Translational Science Institute.

References

    1. Chowdhury F, Williams A. Transfer from research/academia to clinical/regulated. Bioanalysis. 2016;8(20):2169–76. - PubMed
    1. Reddy SSK, Chao S. Academic collaborations with industry: lessons for the future. J Investig Med. 2020;68(8):1305–8. - PubMed
    1. Loree JM, Anand S, Dasari A, Unger JM, Gothwal A, Ellis LM, et al. Disparity of race reporting and representation in clinical trials leading to cancer drug approvals from 2008 to 2018. JAMA Oncol. 2019;5(10):e191870. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Schmotzer GL. Barriers and facilitators to participation of minorities in clinical trials. Ethn Dis. 2012;22(2):226–30. - PubMed
    1. Hussain-Gambles M, Atkin K, Leese B. Why ethnic minority groups are under-represented in clinical trials: a review of the literature. Health Soc Care Community. 2004;12(5):382–8. - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources