Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jun 6;19(1):63.
doi: 10.1186/s40246-025-00766-1.

Parents' perspectives on expanded newborn genomic screening in Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates

Affiliations

Parents' perspectives on expanded newborn genomic screening in Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates

Yasir Ahmed Mohammed Elhadi et al. Hum Genomics. .

Abstract

Background: Newborn genomic screening offers the potential for early detection and management of genetic disorders. Understanding parental perspectives is essential before integrating genomic testing into standard newborn screening.

Methods: This was a descriptive cross-sectional study surveyed 568 parents in Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates (UAE). An online self-administered validated and piloted questionnaire was used to gather information on demographic characteristic and perspectives regarding newborn genomic screening. Data were analysed using R version 4.4.3.

Results: Most parents (78.2%) supported integrating genomics into newborn screening programs, with 63.5% stating it requires distinct management from standard screening. Females preferred geneticists (38.2% vs. 32.5%, p < 0.001) and hospitals (45.1% vs. 39.2%, p < 0.001) for discussions, with 74.2% emphasizing explicit consent compared to 68.5% of males (p < 0.002). Treatability (82.7%), age of symptom onset (74.1%), and severity (72.2%) were key decision-making factors. Additionally, 66.7% preferred genomic testing to be covered by insurance, and 82.2% supported storing genomic data for future use.

Conclusion: Parents participated in the study strongly support genomic newborn screening. Gender-based differences emphasize the need for tailored communication and culturally sensitive strategies to inform policy development and implementation of newborn genomic screening program in the UAE and similar contexts.

Keywords: Newborn genomic screening; Parental perspectives; Public health; Testing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: This study adhered to the ethical principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical approval was granted by the Social Science Ethical Review Committee at the United Arab Emirates University. Informed written consent was obtained from all participants before data collection commenced. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Parental attitudes toward genomic screening and consent
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Parental preferences for genomic testing by child group
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Factors influencing parental decisions on newborn genomic testing
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Parents’ perceived benefits and risks of genomic testing in newborn screening

Similar articles

References

    1. Wilcken B. Expanded newborn screening: reducing harm, assessing benefit. J Inherit Metab Dis. 2010;33 SUPPL. 2. - PubMed
    1. Dhondt JL. Expanded newborn screening: social and ethical issues. J Inherit Metab Dis. 2010;33 Suppl 2. - PubMed
    1. Al Hosani H, Salah M, Osman HM, Farag HM, El-Assiouty L, Saade D, et al. Expanding the comprehensive National neonatal screening programme in the united Arab Emirates from 1995 to 2011. East Mediterr Heal J. 2014;20:17–23. - PubMed
    1. Skrinska V, Khneisser I, Schielen P, Loeber G. Introducing and expanding newborn screening in the MENA region. Int J Neonatal Screen. 2020;6:12. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Khan GA, Al Hammadi G, Ziyada A, Al Waeel K, Ayman L, Elddin Elgailani ES. Prevalence of consanguineous marriages in UAE nationals and the risk of genetic diseases. J Med. 2023;24:82–8.

LinkOut - more resources