Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jul 7;35(13):3022-3034.e4.
doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2025.05.011. Epub 2025 Jun 6.

Negative feedback equalizes polarity sites in a multi-budding yeast

Affiliations

Negative feedback equalizes polarity sites in a multi-budding yeast

Alex W Crocker et al. Curr Biol. .

Abstract

Morphogenesis in fungi and animals is directed by the polarization of the small GTPases Cdc42 and Rac. In the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, competition between polarity patches results in one polarized patch and the growth of a single bud. Here, we describe cell polarity in the yeast Aureobasidium pullulans, which establishes multiple coexisting polarity sites yielding multiple buds during a single cell-division cycle. Polarity machinery components oscillate in their abundance in these coexisting sites but do so independently of one another, pointing to a lack of global coupling between sites. Previous theoretical work has demonstrated that negative feedback in a polarity circuit could promote the coexistence of multiple polarity sites, and time-delayed negative feedback is known to cause oscillations. We show that both these features of negative feedback depend on a protein we identified as Pak1 and that Pak1 requires Rac1 but not Cdc42 for its localization. This work shows how conserved signaling networks can be modulated for distinct morphogenic programs even within the constraints of fungal budding.

Keywords: Cdc42; Pak1; extremotolerant yeasts; multi-budding; polarity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of interests The authors declare no competing interests.

Similar articles

Cited by

  • Allocation of resources among multiple daughter cells.
    Wirshing ACE, Alonso-Matilla R, Yan M, Khalid S, Colarusso AV, Odde D, Lew DJ. Wirshing ACE, et al. bioRxiv [Preprint]. 2025 May 3:2025.05.02.651883. doi: 10.1101/2025.05.02.651883. bioRxiv. 2025. PMID: 40654981 Free PMC article. Preprint.

References

    1. Hall A (1994). Small GTP-binding proteins and the regulation of the actin cytoskeleton. Annu. Rev. Cell Biol 10, 31–54. 10.1146/annurev.cb.10.110194.000335. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Etienne-Manneville S, and Hall A (2002). Rho GTPases in cell biology. Nature 420, 629–635. 10.1038/nature01148. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wu C-F, and Lew DJ (2013). Beyond symmetry-breaking: competition and negative feedback in GTPase regulation. Trends Cell Biol. 23, 476–483. 10.1016/j.tcb.2013.05.003. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Etienne-Manneville S (2004). Cdc42--the centre of polarity. J. Cell Sci 117, 1291–1300. 10.1242/jcs.01115. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Houk AR, Jilkine A, Mejean CO, Boltyanskiy R, Dufresne ER, Angenent SB, Altschuler SJ, Wu LF, and Weiner OD (2012). Membrane tension maintains cell polarity by confining signals to the leading edge during neutrophil migration. Cell 148, 175–188. 10.1016/j.cell.2011.10.050. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources