Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Jun 7;20(1):50.
doi: 10.1186/s13017-025-00622-6.

Comparing percutaneous treatment and cholecystectomy outcomes in acute cholecystitis patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Gabriele Fanciulli  1 , Giuliana Favara  2 , Andrea Maugeri  2 , Martina Barchitta  2 , Antonella Agodi  3 , Guido Basile  1
Affiliations
Review

Comparing percutaneous treatment and cholecystectomy outcomes in acute cholecystitis patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Gabriele Fanciulli et al. World J Emerg Surg. .

Abstract

Background: Acute cholecystitis (AC) is a common and serious condition characterized by gallbladder inflammation, most often caused by cystic duct obstruction due to gallstones. Although laparoscopic cholecystectomy (CC) is the preferred surgical treatment, percutaneous cholecystostomy (PC) is frequently considered for high-risk surgical patients. The optimal management strategy for these patients remains a topic of debate. These systematic review and meta-analysis aim to provide an updated evaluation of studies comparing the clinical outcomes of AC patients treated with PC versus those undergoing CC, as well as the outcomes of CC alone versus PC followed by CC.

Methods: A literature search was carried out across Web of Science, Medline, Embase, and PubMed up to April 2024. Observational studies comparing patients undergoing PC versus CC, as well as CC versus PC followed by CC, and reporting mortality, morbidity, and readmission were included. Data extraction and quality assessment were independently performed by two reviewers, with bias risk evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Scale. The pooled odds ratio (OR) was obtained through meta-analyses by using STATA software (Version 18).

Results: A total of 27 studies were included, with 16 comparing PC versus CC and 11 assessing PC followed by CC versus CC alone. Meta-analyses revealed that CC was associated with significantly lower mortality (OR = 0.26; 95% CI = 0.14-0.48) and readmission rates (OR = 0.37; 95% CI = 0.18-0.75) compared to PC. The benefits of laparoscopic cholecystectomy over percutaneous cholecystostomy were particularly evident for mortality (OR = 0.17; 95% CI = 0.09-0.33), while a non-significant trend towards reduced readmission rates was also observed (OR = 0.28; 95% CI = 0.07-1.13). However, PC was identified as a viable alternative in high-risk surgical patients. Studies examining PC followed by CC versus CC alone showed diverse results, with some indicating reduced surgical complications and improved outcomes, while others reported no significant benefits.

Conclusion: This work highlights that CC is associated with better outcomes, including lower mortality and readmission rates, compared to both PC alone and PC followed by CC. The combined approach did not show a significant advantage over immediate CC. Further research with larger studies and standardized protocols is needed to refine treatment strategies for high-risk AC patients.

Keywords: Acute cholecystitis; Cholecystectomy; Cholecystostomy; Outcome; Surgical treatment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: Not applicable. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
PRISMA flow diagram of study selection process
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Forest plot showing the proportion of deaths in PC and CC patients
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Forest plot showing the proportion of readmissions in PC and CC patients
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Wadhwa V, Trivedi PS, Makary MS, Strain DV, Ahmed O, Chick JFB, et al. Utilization and outcomes of cholecystostomy and cholecystectomy in patients admitted with acute cholecystitis: A nationwide analysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2021;216(6):1558–65. - PubMed
    1. Anderson JE, Chang DC, Talamini MA. A nationwide examination of outcomes of percutaneous cholecystostomy compared with cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis, 1998–2010. Surg Endosc. 2013;27(9):3406–11. - PubMed
    1. Pisano M, Allievi N, Gurusamy K, Borzellino G, Cimbanassi S, Boerna D, et al. 2020 World society of emergency surgery updated guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute calculus cholecystitis. World J Emerg Surg. 2020;15(1):61. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wiggins T, Markar SR, Mackenzie H, Jamel S, Askari A, Faiz O, et al. Evolution in the management of acute cholecystitis in the elderly: population-based cohort study. Surg Endosc. 2018;32(10):4078–86. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zehetner J, Degnera E, Olasky J, Mason RA, Drangsholt S, Moazzez A, et al. Percutaneous cholecystostomy versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with acute cholecystitis and failed Conservative management: a matched-pair analysis. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2014;24(6):523–7. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources