Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2025 Jun 7;26(1):572.
doi: 10.1186/s12891-025-08835-1.

Comparative effectiveness of nitinol staple-only fixation versus antiglide plate fixation for Weber type B distal fibular fractures

Kensei Yoshimoto  1   2 , Masahiko Noguchi  3 , Takumi Koseki  3 , Ayako Tominaga  3   4 , Ken Okazaki  4
Affiliations
Comparative Study

Comparative effectiveness of nitinol staple-only fixation versus antiglide plate fixation for Weber type B distal fibular fractures

Kensei Yoshimoto et al. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. .

Abstract

Background: Interest in less invasive surgeries for Weber type B distal fibular fracture has increased recently. This study aimed to demonstrate that nitinol staple-only fixation is less invasive compared to antiglide plate fixation.

Materials and methods: This retrospective review involved 59 patients with Weber type B fibular fractures who underwent surgery between 2018 and 2023. Twenty-eight patients underwent antiglide plate fixation, whereas 31 underwent multiple nitinol staple-only fixation. The intraoperative assessment included skin incision length and operative time. The radiographic outcomes were bone union and fibular length. The clinical outcomes included delayed wound healing, infection, discomfort from the implant, implant removal, and the Self-Administered Foot Evaluation Questionnaire (SAFE-Q) score administered at the last visit.

Results: The mean skin incision length and operative time of nitinol staple-only fixation were 3.8 ± 0.5 cm and 19.6 ± 3.6 min, compared with 8.7 ± 1.3 cm and 48.8 ± 10.6 min for plate fixation, respectively. Bone union was confirmed in all patients without fibular shortening. Although no significant differences in patients with delayed wound healing, infection, or postoperative SAFE-Q scores were found between the two groups, more patients with plate fixation reported discomfort from the implant (71.4% vs. 32.3%) and requested its removal (75.0% vs. 35.5%).

Conclusion: Multiple nitinol staple-only fixations offer the advantages of a smaller skin incision, shorter operative time, lesser discomfort from the implants, and a reduced need for implant removal compared with antiglide plate fixation. Furthermore, staple-only fixation could achieve bone union without loss of correction. This suggests that multiple nitinol staple-only fixation may be less invasive and more beneficial for patients than antiglide plate fixation.

Keywords: Ankle fracture; Antiglide plates; Fibula fracture; Fracture fixation; Nitinol staples.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: The responsible institutional review board of Shiseikai Daini Hospital approved this study (IRB number: 145). All participants approved the informed consent of the use of imaging and clinical data. This study was carried out in accordance with the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki. Consent for publication: Written informed consent to participate in this study and publish identifiable images or information was obtained from all participants, and parent/guardian consent was obtained for participants under the age of 18. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Preoperative and postoperative anteroposterior and lateral radiographs of a patient who underwent antiglide plate fixation
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Fixation technique using nitinol staples. The initial 3-cm skin incision (A). The fracture was reduced using a bone clamp forceps (B) and fixed by placing the nitinol staple at the center, perpendicular to the fracture line after drilling (C and D). The bone clamp forceps were removed after fixation with a single staple, and two additional staples were placed in posterior and anterior fracture sites (E)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Preoperative and postoperative anteroposterior and lateral radiographs of a patient who underwent fixation with multiple nitinol staples
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
The fibular length is defined as the distance from the fibular tip to the tibial articular surface
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Court-Brown CM, Caesar B. Epidemiology of adult fractures: a review. Injury. 2006;37:691–7. - PubMed
    1. Gu S, Wang S, Gong Y, Ren Y, Feng H. Numerical simulations of the effect of lateral malleolus fracture malunion on ankle biomechanics: different offset directions and offsets. Foot Ankle Surg. 2024;30:135–44. - PubMed
    1. Hughes JL, Weber H, Willenegger HKE. Evaluation of ankle fractures: non-operative and operative treatment. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1979;138:11–9. - PubMed
    1. Han SM, Wu TH, Wen JX, Wang Y, Cao L, Wu WJ, et al. Radiographic analysis of adult ankle fractures using combined Danis-Weber and Lauge-Hansen classification systems. Sci Rep. 2020;10:7655. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Giver Jensen T, Aqeel Khudhair Almadareb M, Booth Nielsen M, Jesper Hansen E, Lindberg-Larsen M. Outcome after treatment of distal fibula fractures using one-third tubular plate, locking compression plate or distal anatomical locking compression plate. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2023;62:524–8. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources