Patients' and clinicians' experiences of DIALOG+ in primary health care in Bosnia and Herzegovina: a qualitative interview study using thematic analysis
- PMID: 40483458
- PMCID: PMC12145582
- DOI: 10.1186/s12875-025-02845-7
Patients' and clinicians' experiences of DIALOG+ in primary health care in Bosnia and Herzegovina: a qualitative interview study using thematic analysis
Abstract
Background: DIALOG + is a low-cost intervention proven to improve the subjective quality of life in patients with psychosis and anxiety disorders in low- and middle-income countries. In a recent study, DIALOG + was shown to be feasible for patients in primary care settings with long-term physical conditions and to result in an improvement in patient outcomes. The aim of this qualitative study was to explore the experiences of patients and clinicians using DIALOG + in Bosnia and Herzegovina to gain a better understanding of its impact in this setting.
Methods: In-depth semi-structured interviews were conducted with 11 patients and 4 physicians, as well as two focus groups with 5 patients in each, all of whom participated in the intervention. Specific life and treatment domains discussed during the sessions between patients and clinicians were also analysed to determine which domains were most frequently addressed and where patients needed the most support. The interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analysed using thematic analysis.
Results: Four qualitative themes were identified: (1) DIALOG + structure and solution-oriented approach are helpful; (2) DIALOG + allows space for conversation; (3) Therapeutic relationship is improved, and (4) The intervention has its limitations.
Conclusions: DIALOG + is a novel primary care intervention with positive effects on patients' lives, which enhance primary care. Nevertheless, it presents a new challenge in this setting. It is necessary to make adjustments in primary care, such as providing clinicians with more extensive training and ongoing support, as well as providing more time for the intervention's implementation.
Trial registration: Study was registered prospectively within the ISRCTN Registry: ISRCTN17003451, 02/12/2020.
Keywords: Mental health service; Primary health care; Psychosocial interventions; Quality of life; Solution-focused.
© 2025. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Human ethics and consent to participate: All the methods in the study have been carried out by relevant human subjects research guidelines and regulations. The original study, including this, received positive ethical opinions from the relevant ethics committees both in B&H and the UK: The Clinical Centre University of Sarajevo School of Medicine Research Ethics Committee (Etički komitet Kliničkog centra Univerziteta u Sarajevu), approval received on 21/07/2020 and Queen Mary Ethics of Research Committee, ref: QMERC20.101, approval received on 27.01.2021. All participants who were contacted by a researcher were provided with a written information about the study and those patients who provided written informed consent proceeded to eligibility screening. Consent to publish: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.
Similar articles
-
Feasibility and outcomes of using DIALOG+ in primary care to improve quality of life and mental distress of patients with long-term physical conditions: an exploratory non-controlled study in Bosnia and Herzegovina, Colombia and Uganda.BMC Prim Care. 2023 Nov 16;24(1):241. doi: 10.1186/s12875-023-02197-0. BMC Prim Care. 2023. PMID: 37968592 Free PMC article.
-
Feasibility, experiences and outcomes of using DIALOG+ in primary care to improve quality of life and mental distress of patients with chronic conditions: an exploratory non-controlled trial in Bosnia and Herzegovina, Colombia and Uganda.Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2021 Sep 30;7(1):180. doi: 10.1186/s40814-021-00914-z. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2021. PMID: 34593055 Free PMC article.
-
Effective patient–clinician interaction to improve treatment outcomes for patients with psychosis: a mixed-methods design.Southampton (UK): NIHR Journals Library; 2017 Feb. Southampton (UK): NIHR Journals Library; 2017 Feb. PMID: 28252893 Free Books & Documents. Review.
-
Resource-oriented interventions for patients with severe mental illnesses in low- and middle-income countries: trials in Bosnia-Herzegovina, Colombia and Uganda.BMC Psychiatry. 2019 Jun 14;19(1):181. doi: 10.1186/s12888-019-2148-x. BMC Psychiatry. 2019. PMID: 31200671 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Behavioural modification interventions for medically unexplained symptoms in primary care: systematic reviews and economic evaluation.Health Technol Assess. 2020 Sep;24(46):1-490. doi: 10.3310/hta24460. Health Technol Assess. 2020. PMID: 32975190 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Priebe S, Golden E, Kingdon D, Omer S, Walsh S, Katevas K, et al. Effective patient–clinician interaction to improve treatment outcomes for patients with psychosis: a mixed-methods design. Programme Grants Appl Res. 2017;5:1–160. - PubMed
-
- Priebe S, Bogic M, Ajdukovic D, Franciskovic T, Maria Galeazzi G, Kucukalic A et al. Mental Disorders Following War in the Balkans A Study in 5 Countries. 2010. - PubMed
-
- Slatina Murga S, Janković S, Muhić M, Sikira H, Burn E, Priebe S, et al. Effectiveness of a structured intervention to make routine clinical meetings therapeutically effective (DIALOG+) for patients with depressive and anxiety disorders in Bosnia and Herzegovina: A cluster randomised controlled trial. Psychiatry research communications. Elsevier B.V.; 2021. - PMC - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
- ref. 16/137/97/National Institute for Health and Care Research
- ref. 16/137/97/National Institute for Health and Care Research
- ref. 16/137/97/National Institute for Health and Care Research
- ref. 16/137/97/National Institute for Health and Care Research
- ref. 16/137/97/National Institute for Health and Care Research
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical