U.S. adults' attitudes toward abortion as a (non)essential procedure during the COVID-19 pandemic
- PMID: 40483506
- PMCID: PMC12144747
- DOI: 10.1186/s12889-025-23266-2
U.S. adults' attitudes toward abortion as a (non)essential procedure during the COVID-19 pandemic
Abstract
Background: The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) state “abortion is healthcare” in their advocacy statement. During the COVID-19 pandemic, healthcare services were limited to those deemed “essential,” and some conservative states’ attorneys general classified abortion as “nonessential,” against ACOG recommendations. Subsequent to the pandemic, the 2022 U.S. Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization decision eliminated the federal right to abortion, and many states have severely restricted abortion access, making it important to ask—do people consider abortion essential healthcare? Thus, we explored U.S. adults’ opinions on abortion as an essential medical procedure.
Methods: We collected data via IPSOS’s KnowledgePanel® from September 2020 to January 2021 in four waves, three of which are included in the present study. We asked, “Do you think abortion is an essential medical procedure?” (yes, no, unsure) with a follow-up open-ended question: “Please describe why you [think/do not think/are unsure] abortion is an essential medical procedure.” Our sample comprised 1523 closed-ended and corresponding open-ended responses. We used descriptive statistics to examine closed-ended responses by wave and inductive qualitative content analysis to analyze open-ended responses collapsed across waves.
Results: Among closed-ended responses, 44–46% indicated abortion was an essential procedure, 32–35% indicated abortion was not essential, and 19–22% indicated unsure. Among open-ended responses, 49% stated abortion was an essential medical procedure because abortion is time-sensitive, a right, and prevents suffering. Of open-ended responses, 43% indicated the essentiality of abortion as a medical procedure depends on the reason. And 32% of open-ended responses said abortion is not an essential medical procedure because abortion is elective, wrong/murder, and other procedures should take precedence. We noted instances where closed-ended responses did not correspond with open-ended reasons.
Conclusions: Findings highlight the nuance in conceptualizing abortion as an essential medical procedure. Reasons provided by participants on the extent abortion is an essential medical procedure underscore the contextual nature of abortion attitudes found in previous research. Notably, people indicating abortion was not an essential medical procedure but providing explanations suggesting reasons to consider abortion essential, point to the need for more nuance in assessing abortion attitudes.
Keywords: Abortion attitudes; Abortion healthcare; COVID-19; Essential procedure.
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board at Indiana University. Informed consent to participate in the study was obtained from all participants prior to participation. Research was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Worries, attitudes, and mental health of older adults during the COVID-19 pandemic: Canadian and U.S. perspectives.J Am Geriatr Soc. 2021 May;69(5):1147-1154. doi: 10.1111/jgs.17105. Epub 2021 Mar 18. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2021. PMID: 33738789 Free PMC article.
-
Attitudes of US adults toward using telemedicine to prescribe medication abortion during COVID-19: A mixed methods study.Contraception. 2021 Jul;104(1):104-110. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2021.04.001. Epub 2021 Apr 18. Contraception. 2021. PMID: 33848466 Free PMC article.
-
Attitudes toward abortion, social welfare programs, and gender roles in the U.S. and South Africa.Crit Public Health. 2020;30(4):441-456. doi: 10.1080/09581596.2019.1601683. Epub 2019 Apr 19. Crit Public Health. 2020. PMID: 35368244 Free PMC article.
-
Determinants of Health Care Providers' Attitudes Toward Safe Abortion Care in Ethiopia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Health Serv Insights. 2024 Apr 6;17:11786329241245218. doi: 10.1177/11786329241245218. eCollection 2024. Health Serv Insights. 2024. PMID: 38584863 Free PMC article. Review.
-
[Innovation in abortion care during the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany, France and Great Britain : Paths to maintaining access and building system resilience].Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2025 Jan;68(1):53-61. doi: 10.1007/s00103-024-03995-2. Epub 2024 Dec 11. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2025. PMID: 39663247 Free PMC article. Review. German.
References
-
- The American college of obstetricians and gynecologists. Facts are Important: Abortion Is Healthcare. [cited 2025 Apr 24]; Abortion Is Healthcare. Available from: https://www.acog.org/advocacy/facts-are-important/abortion-is-healthcare
-
- Bowman K, Goldstein S. Attitudes about abortion: A comprehensive review of polls from the 1970s to today. American Enterprise Institute. 2021; (AEI Public Opinion Studies).
-
- CMS. Non-emergent, elective medical services, and treatment recommendations [Internet]. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Apr 2020; Available from: https://www.cms.gov/files/document/cms-non-emergent-elective-medical-rec...
-
- Co D, Abortion access and COVID-19: essential or non-essential procedure? [Internet]. Preprints. Jun 2020; [cited 2024 Mar 6]. Available from: https://www.authorea.com/users/334781/articles/460705-abortion-access-an...
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources