Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Nov:162:105883.
doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2025.105883. Epub 2025 Jun 6.

Assessment of endocrine disruptors in the European Union: Current regulatory framework, use of new approach methodologies (NAMs) and recommendations for improvements

Affiliations
Free article
Review

Assessment of endocrine disruptors in the European Union: Current regulatory framework, use of new approach methodologies (NAMs) and recommendations for improvements

Marie Louise Holmer et al. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2025 Nov.
Free article

Abstract

Exposure to endocrine disruptors (EDs) are associated with significant risks to human health and the environment. The European Union (EU) thus prioritizes their identification and regulation and is developing a roadmap to phase out animal testing in chemical safety assessments while advancing New Approach Methodologies (NAMs). This review outlines EU's practices for ED identification, focusing on the use of NAMs, as well as Defined Approaches and read-across. We assessed the current EU framework under the Classification, Labelling and Packaging (CLP) Regulation, the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH), the Plant Protection Products Regulation (PPPR), and the Biocidal Products Regulation (BPR), evaluating current use of NAMs and reflection on potential future use. We find that EU legislation and guidance documents allow the use of NAMs in ED identification, including for assessment of endocrine activity and adversity. However, guidance on predicting adversity using NAMs remains limited, and ED identifications have largely depended on animal data to assess endocrine-mediated adversity. Continued in vivo testing until reliable methodologies are accepted as alternatives and routinely applied is required. The report concludes with short- and long-term recommendations for updates to the information requirements across regulations and further development of methods to predict endocrine-mediated adversity.

Keywords: Biocides; CLP; Chemicals regulation; Classification; Endocrine disruption; Endocrine disruptors; Legislation; NAMs; New approach methodologies; Non-animal; Pesticides; Plant protection products; REACH.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Similar articles

Cited by

Substances

LinkOut - more resources