Assessment of endocrine disruptors in the European Union: Current regulatory framework, use of new approach methodologies (NAMs) and recommendations for improvements
- PMID: 40484110
- DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2025.105883
Assessment of endocrine disruptors in the European Union: Current regulatory framework, use of new approach methodologies (NAMs) and recommendations for improvements
Abstract
Exposure to endocrine disruptors (EDs) are associated with significant risks to human health and the environment. The European Union (EU) thus prioritizes their identification and regulation and is developing a roadmap to phase out animal testing in chemical safety assessments while advancing New Approach Methodologies (NAMs). This review outlines EU's practices for ED identification, focusing on the use of NAMs, as well as Defined Approaches and read-across. We assessed the current EU framework under the Classification, Labelling and Packaging (CLP) Regulation, the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH), the Plant Protection Products Regulation (PPPR), and the Biocidal Products Regulation (BPR), evaluating current use of NAMs and reflection on potential future use. We find that EU legislation and guidance documents allow the use of NAMs in ED identification, including for assessment of endocrine activity and adversity. However, guidance on predicting adversity using NAMs remains limited, and ED identifications have largely depended on animal data to assess endocrine-mediated adversity. Continued in vivo testing until reliable methodologies are accepted as alternatives and routinely applied is required. The report concludes with short- and long-term recommendations for updates to the information requirements across regulations and further development of methods to predict endocrine-mediated adversity.
Keywords: Biocides; CLP; Chemicals regulation; Classification; Endocrine disruption; Endocrine disruptors; Legislation; NAMs; New approach methodologies; Non-animal; Pesticides; Plant protection products; REACH.
Copyright © 2025 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Similar articles
-
Countdown to 2027 - maximising use of NAMs in food safety assessment: closing the gap for regulatory assessments in Europe.Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2025 Nov;162:105863. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2025.105863. Epub 2025 May 29. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2025. PMID: 40449716 Review.
-
A reference list of neurotoxicants based on CLP harmonised classifications.Neurotoxicology. 2025 Jul;109:11-26. doi: 10.1016/j.neuro.2025.05.006. Epub 2025 May 19. Neurotoxicology. 2025. PMID: 40398565 Review.
-
Human health risk assessment for microbial pesticides in the EU: challenges and perspectives.Environ Health. 2025 Jul 2;24(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s12940-025-01196-1. Environ Health. 2025. PMID: 40605039 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A proposal of criteria to support the EU classification on endocrine disruption for the thyroid modality and their application to four data-rich case studies.Arch Toxicol. 2025 Jul;99(7):2727-2758. doi: 10.1007/s00204-025-04037-9. Epub 2025 May 10. Arch Toxicol. 2025. PMID: 40347277 Free PMC article.
-
EU roadmap for phasing out animal testing for chemical safety assessments: Recommendations from a multi-stakeholder roundtable.ALTEX. 2025;42(3):435-450. doi: 10.14573/altex.2503241. Epub 2025 Mar 26. ALTEX. 2025. PMID: 40266612
Cited by
-
Disrupting Defenses: Effects of Bisphenol A and Its Analogs on Human Antibody Production In Vitro.Life (Basel). 2025 Jul 28;15(8):1203. doi: 10.3390/life15081203. Life (Basel). 2025. PMID: 40868850 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous