Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 May 23:16:1574900.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1574900. eCollection 2025.

Organ donation after medically assisted death on psychiatric grounds: an ethical analysis

Affiliations

Organ donation after medically assisted death on psychiatric grounds: an ethical analysis

Karlijn van Vlerken et al. Front Psychiatry. .

Abstract

Organ donation after medical assistance in dying (MAID) on psychiatric grounds is a relatively new practice that poses complex ethical challenges. This paper explores several ethical issues that are important for guiding current and future practice. While organ donation after MAID may alleviate organ shortages, it also prompts concerns regarding the instrumentalization of human life. However, it can be argued that if a patient wishes to donate, based on insight and deliberation, the person is not just regarded as a means. This implies that decision-making capacity is crucial, which requires considering the potential influence of psychiatric disorders. A further issue that can compromise decision-making is susceptibility to external pressures. Careful assessment of the patient's decision-making capacity and the absence of external pressure are needed to avoid the stigmatization of individuals with psychiatric conditions. Further research to better understand the possible interplay between psychiatric disorders and decision-making capacity in the context of organ donation after MAID is recommended.

Keywords: autonomy; decision-making capacity; medical assistance in dying; organ donation; stigmatization.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Similar articles

References

    1. Regional Euthanasia Review Committees . Annual Report 2022 (2023). Available online at: https://www.euthanasiecommissie.nl/de-toetsingscommissies/uitspraken/jaa... (Accessed February 2, 2024).
    1. Verhofstadt M, Marijnissen R, Creemers D, Rasing S, Schweren L, Sterckx S, et al. . Exploring the interplay of clinical, ethical and societal dynamics: two decades of Medical Assistance in Dying (MAID) on psychiatric grounds in the Netherlands and Belgium. Front Psychiatry. (2024) 15:1463813. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1463813 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Regional Euthanasia Review Committees . Due care criteria. Ministerie van Volksgezondheid, Welzijn en Sport (2016). Available online at: https://english.euthanasiecommissie.nl/due-care-criteria (Accessed February 2, 2024).
    1. Mulder J, Sonneveld H, Van Raemdonck D, Downar J, Wiebe K, Domínguez-Gil B, et al. . Practice and challenges for organ donation after medical assistance in dying: A scoping review including the results of the first international roundtable in 2021. Am J Transplant. (2022) 22:2759–80. doi: 10.1111/ajt.17198 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Silva E Silva V, Silva AR, Rochon A, Lotherington K, Hornby L, Wind T, et al. . Organ donation following medical assistance in dying, Part I: a scoping review of legal and ethical aspects. JBI Evid Synth. (2024) 22:157–94. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-22-00143 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources