Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 May 1:24:100970.
doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2025.100970. eCollection 2025 Jul.

Current practice in pediatric post-cardiac arrest care: a national survey among Italian pediatric intensivists

Affiliations

Current practice in pediatric post-cardiac arrest care: a national survey among Italian pediatric intensivists

Giovanni Babini et al. Resusc Plus. .

Abstract

Background and aims: Pediatric post-cardiac arrest care (PCAC) is an evolving science with many uncertainties leading to many variations in practice. This study aimed to investigate the current practice in PCAC care across Italian paediatric intensive care units (PICUs), interviewing a cohort of pediatric intensivists.

Methods: An electronic survey with 69 questions was distributed to 54 physicians from 23 PICUs in Italy. The survey covered various domains of PCAC care, including hemodynamics, oxygenation and ventilation, sedation, seizure and temperature control, infection treatment, glycemic control, transfusion practice, neuroprognostication, post-CA recovery and rehabilitation, organisation and local protocols.

Results: Twenty-eight out of 54 invited physicians (51%) completed the survey, accounting for 82% of the participating PICUs. Up to 80% reported no specific PCAC protocol in their PICU. Half of the respondents suggested specific recommendations for patients of lower ages, particularly infants. Significant variability was observed in hemodynamic monitoring and support; 45% did not have a specific hemodynamic target, while 41% aimed for a systolic arterial pressure above the 50th age-specific percentile. Seventy-one percent lacked a protocol for target temperature management (TTM), with significant variability in practice. Sixty-four percent did not have a scheduled follow-up program for survivors after hospital discharge. A rehabilitation program for survivors and psychological support for patients and their families were available in half of the instances. Neuroprotective strategies, prognostication, and hemodynamic management were the top PCAC research priorities reported.

Conclusion: The study revealed significant variability in PCAC care practices among pediatric intensivists. The majority of surveyed practitioners evidenced the limits of current PCAC evidence, potentially advocating the need for further research. The top three areas recognised as PCAC research priorities include hemodynamic optimisation, neuroprotective therapies and neuroprognostication.

Keywords: Cardiac arrest; Pediatric; Post-cardiac arrest; Resuscitation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Giovanni Babini reports a relationship with LUM Giuseppe Degennaro University that includes: speaking and lecture fees. Giovanni Babini reports a relationship with Italian Resuscitation Council that includes: non-financial support and travel reimbursement. Alberto Cucino reports a relationship with Italian Resuscitation Council that includes: board membership, non-financial support, and travel reimbursement. Giuseppe Stirparo reports a relationship with Italian Resuscitation Council that includes: non-financial support and travel reimbursement. Giovanni Babini, Alberto Cucino and Giuseppe Stirparo are members of the Scientific Committee of the IRC. Alberto Cucino is member of the Executive Committee of the IRC. If there are other authors, they declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Patients admitted to PICU after pediatric cardiac arrest in a two-year period (2022–2023).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Hemodynamic monitoring used in pediatric post-cardiac arrest patients.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Drug selection in case of shock refractory to fluid resuscitation in pediatric post-cardiac arrest patients.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Methods considered most reliable for neuroprognostication in pediatric post-cardiac arrest patients.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Domains considered research priorities in pediatric post-cardiac arrest.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Blinder J., Nadkarni V., Naim M., Rossano J.W., Berg R.A. In: Pediatric and Congenital Cardiology, Cardiac Surgery and Intensive Care. da Cruz E.M., Ivy D., Hraska V., Jaggers J., editors. Springer; London: 2020. Epidemiology of Pediatric cardiac arrest; pp. 1–18.
    1. Holmberg M.J., Ross C.E., Fitzmaurice G.M., et al. Annual incidence of adult and pediatric in-hospital cardiac arrest in the United States. Circ: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes. 2019;12 doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.119.005580. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Atkins D.L., Everson-Stewart S., Sears G.K., et al. Epidemiology and outcomes from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in children: the resuscitation outcomes consortium epistry–cardiac arrest. Circulation. 2009;119:1484–1491. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.802678. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Okubo M., Chan H.K., Callaway C.W., Mann N.C., Wang H.E. Characteristics of paediatric out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in the United States. Resuscitation. 2020;153:227–233. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2020.04.023. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bimerew M., Wondmieneh A., Gedefaw G., Gebremeskel T., Demis A., Getie A. Survival of pediatric patients after cardiopulmonary resuscitation for in-hospital cardiac arrest: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ital J Pediatr. 2021;47:118. doi: 10.1186/s13052-021-01058-9. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources