Restoring a critically endangered grassland orchid by co-planting to improve pollination and selecting sites based on pollinator availability
- PMID: 40487223
- PMCID: PMC12141344
- DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2025.1566543
Restoring a critically endangered grassland orchid by co-planting to improve pollination and selecting sites based on pollinator availability
Abstract
In many geographic regions grasslands have been heavily cleared and degraded, which represents a challenge for translocating threatened flora back into these landscapes. As most plant species require animals for pollination, pollinators are potentially a key limitation for re-establishing populations. For the Critically Endangered orchid Diuris fragrantissima, we identify the pollinator(s), survey for pollinators at candidate translocation sites, test if remnant size affects bee species richness, and test if pollination rates can be enhanced through co-planting with rewarding plant species. We found that D. fragrantissima is visited by ten species of bee but is only effectively pollinated by two native species, Lipotriches (Austronomia) sp. (Halictidae) and Lasioglossum (Chilalictus) orbatum (Halictidae), and the introduced honeybee Apis mellifera (Apidae). Interestingly, A. mellifera was responsible for the greatest number of pollinia removals and depositions. Pollinators of D. fragrantissima were not detected at some candidate translocation sites, with bee species richness and overall abundance significantly increasing with grassland remnant size. The pollination of D. fragrantissima was significantly enhanced through the presence of Wahlenbergia stricta (Campanulaceae) within 30 cm of plants, but not Arthropodium strictum (Asparagaceae) or Dianella reflexa (Asphodelaceae). We recommend that prior to conservation translocations of Diuris that pollinator surveys are undertaken, with preference given to larger grassland remnants. Apis mellifera may serve to buffer D. fragrantissima against loss of native pollinators from remnant grassland but could have adverse effects on other native species. We show that co-planting with rewarding species may be an effective approach for improving pollination success of threatened orchids.
Keywords: APIs; Diuris; bee; conservation; orchid; pollinator; reproduction; restoration.
Copyright © 2025 Reiter, Dimon, Bohman, Batley, McLachlan, Woodward and Phillips.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The handling editor declared a past co-authorship with the authors RP, NR.
Figures



Similar articles
-
Evidence of introduced honeybees (Apis mellifera) as pollen wasters in orchid pollination.Sci Rep. 2024 Jun 18;14(1):14076. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-64218-x. Sci Rep. 2024. PMID: 38890342 Free PMC article.
-
Biodiversity measures of a grassland plant-pollinator community are resilient to the introduction of honey bees (Apis mellifera).PLoS One. 2024 Oct 25;19(10):e0309939. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0309939. eCollection 2024. PLoS One. 2024. PMID: 39453908 Free PMC article.
-
Brief Pollination Assessment of a Critically Endangered Food-Deceptive Orchid (Cypripedium guttatum) Using a Network Approach.Plants (Basel). 2022 Mar 17;11(6):798. doi: 10.3390/plants11060798. Plants (Basel). 2022. PMID: 35336680 Free PMC article.
-
Orchid pollination by sexual deception: pollinator perspectives.Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2011 Feb;86(1):33-75. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-185X.2010.00134.x. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2011. PMID: 20377574 Review.
-
Why are there so many bee-orchid species? Adaptive radiation by intra-specific competition for mnesic pollinators.Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2020 Dec;95(6):1630-1663. doi: 10.1111/brv.12633. Epub 2020 Sep 21. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2020. PMID: 32954662 Review.
References
-
- Ackerman J. D. (1981). Pollination biology of Calypso bulbosa var. occidentals (Orchidaceae): a food-deception system. Madroño 28, 101–110.
-
- Ackerman J. D., Phillips R. D., Tremblay R. L., Karreman A., Reiter N., Peter C. I., et al. . (2023). Beyond the various contrivances by which orchids are pollinated, global patterns in orchid pollination biology. Botanical J. Linn. Soc. 202, 295–324. doi: 10.1093/botlinnean/boac082 - DOI
-
- Andrade B. O., Bonilha C. L., de Abreu Ferreira P. M., Boldrini I. I., Overbeck G. E. (2016). Highland grasslands at the southern tip of the Atlantic Forest biome: management options and conservation challenges. Oecologia Australis 20, 37–61. doi: 10.4257/oeco.2016.2002.04 - DOI
-
- Archer S. R., Davies K. W., Fulbright T. E., McDaniel K. C., Wilcox B. P., Predick K. I., et al. . (2011). “Brush management as a rangeland conservation strategy: a critical evaluation,” in Conservation benefits of rangeland practices: assessment, recommendations, and knowledge gaps. Ed. Briske D. D. (US Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC: ), 105–170.
-
- Austrheim G., Gunilla E., Olsson A., Grøntvedt E. (1999). Land-use impact on plant communities in semi-natural sub-alpine grasslands of Budalen, central Norway. Biol. Conserv. 87, 369–379. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3207(98)00071-8 - DOI
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials