Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 May 23:7:1544489.
doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2025.1544489. eCollection 2025.

Co-design of a digital 24-hour time-use intervention with older adults and allied health professionals

Affiliations

Co-design of a digital 24-hour time-use intervention with older adults and allied health professionals

Henry T Blake et al. Front Digit Health. .

Abstract

Using co-design principles based on the Health CASCADE framework, we aimed to describe the collaborative process undertaken to develop a 24-hour time-use intervention, called Small Steps, which promoted gradual and incremental health-behavior change. A secondary aim was to reflect on the challenges and benefits of co-design in this project, offering insights into the "why" and "how" to co-design 24-hour time-use interventions with priority populations. Twelve participants were invited and participated in 6 co-design workshops (June 2023-January 2024). To prioritize older adults' views in the end-product, 8 adults aged >65 years (the target population) and 4 allied health professionals with >2 years' experience working with the target population were recruited. Workshops and activities were structured using the British Design Council's Double Diamond Design Process to stimulate design thinking. Where possible, participant-led documentation was used to reduce the bias associated with academic scribing and empower participants to provide input and facilitate ownership for the project. Workshop activities and discussions were captured through printouts, audio and iPad screen recordings and analyzed through reflexive thematic and content analysis. Co-designers contributed to all elements of the intervention including the website design, the content, and the level of researcher input during the intervention. Iterative improvements were made based on the unique perspectives and needs of the community experts. During the action planning process, older adults wanted both support and autonomy, while maintaining the freedom to adapt these options to their individual needs. Older adults also preferred a step-by-step approach, allowing for gradual behavior changes across the intervention to avoid feelings of becoming overwhelmed. The co-design process enabled the tailoring of the Small Steps intervention to the specific needs of its intended audience. Key factors contributing to the co-design included flexibility in the design process, fostering a supportive environment, and empowering participants through activities that guided and stimulated their thinking. These elements not only helped shape the development of Small Steps but reinforced the value of co-design in developing personalised interventions for older adults.

Keywords: 24-hour activity cycle; co-creation; health promotion; intervention; physical activity; sedentary behavior; sleep.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Workshop overview and mapping the intention of activities to the Double Diamond approach. WS, Workshop.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Breakdown of activities (%). Activity categories were drawn directly from the Adult Compendium of Physical Activities (30). Responses are from the older adults only. Older adults were asked to mark any activity that could be “for me”, “for someone else” or “for no older adult”, maximum responses n = 16. Multiple selections could be made (i.e., an older adult could select both “for me” and “for someone else”).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Thematic breakdown of questions on cost and logistics, program details and structure, personal relevance and adaptability, safety and support and assistance.

Similar articles

References

    1. Collins AM, Mellow ML, Smith AE, Wan L, Gothe NP, Fanning J, et al. 24-hour time use and cognitive performance in late adulthood: results from the Investigating Gains in Neurocognition in an Intervention Trial of Exercise (IGNITE) study. Age Ageing. (2025) 54(4):afaf072. 10.1093/ageing/afaf072 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dumuid D, Mellow ML, Olds T, Tregoweth E, Greaves D, Keage H, et al. Does APOE varepsilon4 status change how 24-hour time-use composition is associated with cognitive function? An exploratory analysis among middle-to-older adults. J Alzheimers Dis. (2022) 88(3):1157–65. 10.3233/JAD-220181 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mellow ML, Crozier AJ, Dumuid D, Wade AT, Goldsworthy MR, Dorrian J, et al. How are combinations of physical activity, sedentary behaviour and sleep related to cognitive function in older adults? A systematic review. Exp Gerontol. (2022) 159:111698. 10.1016/j.exger.2022.111698 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dumuid D, Stanford TE, Martin-Fernández J-A, Pedišić Ž, Maher CA, Lewis LK, et al. Compositional data analysis for physical activity, sedentary time and sleep research. Stat Methods Med Res. (2017) 27(12):3726–38. 10.1177/0962280217710835 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pedišić Ž, Dumuid D, Olds TS. Integrating sleep, sedentary behaviour, and physical activity research in the emerging field of time-use epidemiology: definitions, concepts, statistical methods, theoretical framework, and future directions. Kinesiology. (2017) 49(2):252–69. https://hrcak.srce.hr/186506

LinkOut - more resources