Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 May 9:14:103355.
doi: 10.1016/j.mex.2025.103355. eCollection 2025 Jun.

Critical size defect in a rat calvaria model using trephination: An animal model for investigating potential bone regenerative scaffolds

Jeffrey Huang  1 , Jithendra Ratnayake  2 , George J Dias  1
Affiliations

Critical size defect in a rat calvaria model using trephination: An animal model for investigating potential bone regenerative scaffolds

Jeffrey Huang et al. MethodsX. .

Abstract

Animal studies have been a key in vivo investigation in translating bioregenerative material into human clinical trials. The critical size defect (CSD) in a rat's calvaria is a popular methodology for demonstrating and investigating the regenerative properties of a biomaterial. Various surgical approaches have been discussed in the literature on creating CSD and can vary based on species, age and anatomical location. This paper aims to provide a reliable and reproducible step-by-step guide for creating a critical-size defect on the calvaria of a laboratory rat using trephination. This paper will:•Cover the surgical approaches and management in the pre-, intra- and post-operative phases.•Provide figures to help visually guide readers in carrying out the operation.•Cover basic general anaesthetic issues and resolutions.

Keywords: Biomaterials; Bone regeneration; Bony defect; Calvaria; Critical size defect; Critical size defect trephination in rat calvaria using a chitosan-hydroxyapatite scaffold; Rat study; Small animal model; in vivo study.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Figures

Image, graphical abstract
Graphical abstract
Unlabelled image
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Vajgel A., et al. A systematic review on the critical size defect model. Clin. Oral. Implants Res. 2014;25(8):879–893. - PubMed
    1. Hollinger J.O., Kleinschmidt J.C. The critical size defect as an experimental model to test bone repair materials. J. Craniofacial Surg. 1990;1(1) - PubMed
    1. Baldwin P., et al. Autograft, allograft, and bone graft substitutes: clinical evidence and indications for use in the setting of orthopaedic trauma surgery. J. Orthop. Trauma. 2019;33(4) - PubMed
    1. Betz R.R. Limitations of autograft and allograft: new synthetic solutions. Orthopedics. 2002;25(5):S561–S570. - PubMed
    1. Buma P., Schreurs W., Verdonschot N. Skeletal tissue engineering—From in vitro studies to large animal models. Biomaterials. 2004;25(9):1487–1495. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources