Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Sep 1;53(9):e1815-e1820.
doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000006741. Epub 2025 Jun 9.

Consideration of Sociodemographics in Machine Learning-Driven Sepsis Risk Prediction

Affiliations
Review

Consideration of Sociodemographics in Machine Learning-Driven Sepsis Risk Prediction

Katrina E Hauschildt et al. Crit Care Med. .

Abstract

Objectives: Use of machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence (AI) in prediction of sepsis and related outcomes is growing. Guidelines call for explicit reporting of study data demographics and stratified performance analyses to assess potential sociodemographic bias. We assessed reporting of sociodemographic data and other considerations, such as use of stratified analyses or use of so-call "fairness metrics", among AI and ML models in sepsis.

Data sources: PubMed identified systematic and narrative reviews from which studies were extracted using PubMed and Google Scholar.

Study selection: Studies were extracted from selected review articles published between January 1, 2023, and June 30, 2024, and related to sepsis, risk prediction, and ML; we extracted studies predicting sepsis, sepsis-related outcomes, or sepsis treatment in adult populations.

Data extraction: Data were extracted by two reviewers using predefined forms, and included study type, outcome of interest, setting, dataset used, reporting of sample sociodemographics, inclusion of sociodemographics as predictors, stratification by sociodemographics or assessment of fairness metrics, and reporting a lack of sociodemographic considerations as a limitation.

Data synthesis: Thirteen of 96 review studies (14%) met inclusion criteria: six systematic reviews and seven narrative reviews. One hundred twenty of 170 studies (71%) extracted from these review articles were included in our review. Ninety-nine of 120 studies (83%) reported a measure of geography or where data was collected. Eighty (67%) reported sex/gender, 24 (20%) reported race/ethnicity, and 4 (3%) reported other sociodemographics. Only three stratified performance results (2%) by sociodemographics; none reported formal fairness metrics. Beyond a lack of geographic heterogeneity (39/120, 33%), few studies reported a lack of sociodemographic consideration as a limitation.

Conclusions: The inclusion of sociodemographic data and stratified assessment of performance-essential steps in developing equitable risk prediction tools-are possible but have yet to be consistently adopted.

Keywords: artificial intelligence; healthcare disparities; prediction algorithms; selection bias; sepsis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Dr. Admon’s institution received funding from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; he received support for article research from the National Institutes of Health. The remaining authors have disclosed that they do not have any potential conflicts of interest.

References

    1. Evans L, Rhodes A, Alhazzani W, et al.: Surviving sepsis campaign: International guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2021. Intensive Care Med 2021; 47:1181–1247
    1. Schinkel M, van der Poll T, Wiersinga WJ: Artificial intelligence for early sepsis detection: A word of caution. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2023; 207:853–854
    1. Jonker A, Rogers J: What Is Algorithmic Bias? IBM: Artificial Intelligence. 2024. Available at: https://www.ibm.com/think/topics/algorithmic-bias . Accessed December 31, 2024
    1. Obermeyer Z, Powers B, Vogeli C, et al.: Dissecting racial bias in an algorithm used to manage the health of populations. Science 2019; 366:447–453
    1. Henry KE, Adams R, Parent C, et al.: Factors driving provider adoption of the TREWS machine learning-based early warning system and its effects on sepsis treatment timing. Nat Med 2022; 28:1447–1454