Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jun 9;35(1):240.
doi: 10.1007/s00590-025-04307-3.

How reliable is the Deltoid Tuberosity Index? Assessing intra- and interobserver variability and the influence of humeral rotation

Affiliations

How reliable is the Deltoid Tuberosity Index? Assessing intra- and interobserver variability and the influence of humeral rotation

Tomas Da Silva et al. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. .

Abstract

Background: The Deltoid Tuberosity Index (DTI) is a radiographic parameter proposed as an indirect measure of bone mineral density in the humerus, potentially useful in assessing proximal humerus fractures. Despite suggestions that lower DTI values may predict osteosynthesis failure linked to osteopenia, the reliability of DTI measurements-particularly regarding intra- and interobserver variability and the influence of humeral rotation- has not yet been comprehensively validated.

Methods: This study evaluated the reliability of DTI measurements in four parts, involving a total of 1448 measurements performed by seven observers. Interobserver variability was assessed by having seven trauma surgeons measure the DTI on 100 anteroposterior (AP) radiographs of proximal humerus fractures. Intraobserver variability was evaluated by having four observers measure the DTI on three selected radiographs ten times each on different occasions. The impact of humeral internal rotation on DTI measurements was examined using a synthetic humerus model at varying degrees of rotation (0°-90° in 10° increments), with repeated measurements to assess the impact of rotation. Cortical variation in the proximal humerus was assessed using computed tomography (CT) imaging in 10 patients, with DTI measurements conducted at different simulated internal rotation angles to evaluate consistency and compare with radiographic measurements. Finally, the clinical relevance of DTI was evaluated by correlating DTI values with the incidence of screw cutout or secondary displacement in 100 patients treated with PHILOS plates.

Results: Interobserver variability was moderate (ICC = 0.55), with significant differences in DTI measurements across observers (p = 0.0079). Experience level had no significant impact (p = 0.71). Intraobserver variability was low, with a mean coefficient of variation of 3.45%, indicating high consistency within individual observers. Humeral rotation significantly influenced DTI measurements in the synthetic bone model (p < 0.01); however, in patient CT scans, DTI measurements showed minimal variation across rotation angles and correlated strongly with radiographic measurements (r = 0.82-0.89, p < 0.001). No significant correlation was found between DTI values and screw cutout incidence in the overall population. In the subgroup aged 65 to 80 years, only two of the seven observers found a significant correlation between lower DTI values and screw cutout.

Conclusion: This comprehensive study, involving 1448 DTI measurements, revealed not only considerable interobserver variability but also a significant sensitivity to humeral rotation, raising concerns about the DTI's reliability in clinical practice. The inconsistent correlation between DTI and clinical outcomes like screw cutout suggests that the DTI may have limited utility as a predictive tool in managing proximal humerus fractures.

Level of evidence: Level III.

Keywords: DTI; Proximal humerus fractures; Reliability.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Conflict of interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

Similar articles

References

    1. Spross C, Kaestle N, Benninger E et al (2015) Deltoid tuberosity index: a simple radiographic tool to assess local bone quality in proximal humerus fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 473:3038–3045. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-015-4322-x - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Krappinger D, Bizzotto N, Riedmann S et al (2011) Predicting failure after surgical fixation of proximal humerus fractures. Injury 42:1283–1288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2011.01.017 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Min KS, Sheridan B, Waryasz GR et al (2021) Predicting reoperation after operative treatment of proximal humerus fractures. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 31:1105–1112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-020-02841-w - DOI - PubMed
    1. Spross C, Zeledon R, Zdravkovic V, Jost B (2017) How bone quality may influence intraoperative and early postoperative problems after angular stable open reduction-internal fixation of proximal humeral fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 26:1566–1572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2017.02.026 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Taskesen A, Göçer A, Uzel K, Yaradılmış YU (2020) Effect of osteoporosis on proximal humerus fractures. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil 11:2151459320985399. https://doi.org/10.1177/2151459320985399 - DOI - PubMed - PMC

LinkOut - more resources