Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2025 Jun 10;39(9):919-923.
doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000005160.

A Comparison of Maximal Push-Up and Bench Press Performance and Their Prediction Based on Load-Velocity Relationships

Affiliations
Comparative Study

A Comparison of Maximal Push-Up and Bench Press Performance and Their Prediction Based on Load-Velocity Relationships

Roland van den Tillaar et al. J Strength Cond Res. .

Abstract

van den Tillaar, R, Falch, HN, and Larsen, S. A comparison of maximal push-up and bench press performance and their prediction based on load-velocity relationships. J Strength Cond Res 39(9): 919-923, 2025-This study aimed to compare maximal push-up and bench press performance, and their prediction based on the load-velocity relationships. Eleven resistance-trained men (age 25.3 ± 4.0 years, body mass 84.2 ± 6.1 kg, and body height 1.80 ± 0.06 m) performed push-ups and bench presses with 4 different loads randomly. Push-ups were performed with and without a 10-20-30 kg weight vest. Bench press was performed with similar weights as in the push-ups, followed by finding 1RM in each exercise. A linear encoder measured barbell and push-up velocities during the exercises, and force plates were used to measure the average force on the arms during the push-ups. A load-velocity relationship was established between the load and velocity for the push-up and bench press per subject and the equation used to establish a predicted 1RM. The main findings of this study demonstrate that 1RM for push-ups was significantly higher than with bench press (112.4 ± 18.9 vs. 106.4 ± 20.4 kg); meanwhile, there were no differences in the predicted 1RM. Furthermore, an extremely strong association was observed between the actual 1RM loads performed with the push-up and bench press ( r = 0.92). Even with different load-velocity relationships for the 2 exercises, it was possible to predict a cross-over 1RM between them, which was not significantly different from the actual 1RM loads. For coaches and athletes, this method is an easy, cost, and time-effective option for standard 1RM bench press testing to predict maximal upper body strength.

Keywords: 1RM; mean velocity; resistance training; strength; upper body.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

References

    1. Bartolomei S, Nigro F, Ruggeri S, et al. Comparison between bench press throw and ballistic push-up tests to assess upper-body power in trained individuals. J Strength Cond Res 32: 1503–1510, 2018.
    1. Blackard DO, Jensen RL, Ebben WP. Use of EMG analysis in challenging kinetic chain terminology. Med Sci Sports Exerc 31: 443–448, 1999.
    1. Bosco C, Belli A, Astrua M, et al. A dynamometer for evaluation of dynamic muscle work. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 70: 379–386, 1995.
    1. Calatayud J, Borreani S, Colado JC, Martin F, Tella V, Andersen LL. Bench press and push-up at comparable levels of muscle activity results in similar strength gains. J Strength Cond Res 29: 246–253, 2015.
    1. Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1988.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources