Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2025 Oct;214(4):415-425.
doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000004628. Epub 2025 Jun 9.

Ureteroscopy vs Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Lower Pole Renal Stones: Treatment Variation and Outcomes in a Surgical Collaborative

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Ureteroscopy vs Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Lower Pole Renal Stones: Treatment Variation and Outcomes in a Surgical Collaborative

John Michael DiBianco et al. J Urol. 2025 Oct.

Abstract

Purpose: AUA guidelines recommend ureteroscopy (URS) or shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) for lower pole (LP) stones ≤ 1 cm, while SWL is second line for stones > 1 to 2 cm. In the era of increasing URS, there are limited data on the modality used and outcomes. We assessed treatment distribution, stone-free rates (SFRs), and unplanned health care.

Materials and methods: Using the Michigan Urological Surgery Improvement Collaborative registry, we identified URS and SWL cases for LP stones ≤ 2 cm (2016-2021). We assessed the frequency of patients receiving URS or SWL as a proportion of their LP treatment. A logistic model determined predictive probability of treatment modality. Differences in complete SFRs, postoperative emergency department visits, and hospitalizations were assessed by size (≤1 cm, >1-2 cm), adjusted for patient factors and correlation within practice/provider.

Results: There were 3645 procedures from 35 practices (209 surgeons); 2287 (62.7%) had SWL. Of the stones 80.2% were ≤ 1 cm. There was variation in modality based on practice (P < .001) and surgeon (P < .001). For stones ≤ 1 cm, the SFR was higher for URS (56% vs 39%; P < .001). There were no significant differences in SFRs for > 1 to 2 cm stones. Emergency department visits were higher after URS for stones ≤ 1 cm (odds ratio [OR]: 2.95, 95% CI: 1.7-5.0) but not for > 1 to 2 cm stones (OR: 0.97, 95% CI: 0.4-2.2). URS for stones ≤ 1 cm was associated with increased hospitalizations (OR: 4.67, 95% CI: 1.7-12.9) but not for stones > 1 to 2 cm (OR: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.4-2.2).

Conclusions: In Michigan, SWL is the chosen modality for LP stones ≤ 2 cm. For smaller stones, URS was more effective but had greater morbidity. For larger stones, both modalities demonstrated suboptimal efficacy. Our work demonstrates the need for interventions to improve outcomes.

Keywords: nephrolithiasis; quality improvement; retrograde intrarenal surgery; shock wave lithotripsy; ureteroscopy; urolithiasis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

  • Editorial Comment.
    Scales CD Jr. Scales CD Jr. J Urol. 2025 Oct;214(4):424-425. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000004647. Epub 2025 Jun 30. J Urol. 2025. PMID: 40587844 No abstract available.
  • Editorial Comment.
    Friedlander DF. Friedlander DF. J Urol. 2025 Oct;214(4):424. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000004637. Epub 2025 Sep 9. J Urol. 2025. PMID: 40923490 No abstract available.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources