Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jul 1;37(3):319-324.
doi: 10.1097/ANA.0000000000001033. Epub 2025 Mar 3.

Perspectives on Analgesia for Craniotomy: A Survey of Anesthetic Practices

Affiliations

Perspectives on Analgesia for Craniotomy: A Survey of Anesthetic Practices

Anita Vincent et al. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. .

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to compare analgesic practices for patients undergoing craniotomy in high-income countries (HICs) and low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs), focusing on variations in medication use and techniques.

Methods: An English-language and Spanish-language electronic survey was sent to over 300 anesthesiologists in 35 countries from March 22 to May 19, 2024, to gather data on analgesia for craniotomy patients. Anonymous responses through REDCap were analyzed as a whole and by income category (HICs and LMICs).

Results: We received 328 responses (105 HICs, 221 LMICs, and 2 missing locations). Acetaminophen was used by 78% of respondents (HIC: 82%, LMIC: 76%), with low nonavailability in both groups (0.95% HICs, 4.98% LMICs). Fentanyl boluses were used in 57% of cases (HIC: 60%, LMIC: 55%). Incisional local anesthesia was administered in 51% (HIC: 52%, LMIC: 50%), with minimal nonavailability (1.9% HIC, 1.4% LMIC). The use of a remifentanil infusion was more common in HICs (64%) than LMICs (31%), where nonavailability was significantly higher (43.89% vs. 7.62% HICs). Scalp blocks were used by 15% of HICs and 43% of LMICs. Craniotomy indication influenced the choice of analgesia for 61% of respondents.

Conclusions: Analgesic practices for craniotomy vary significantly between HICs and LMICs, primarily due to medication availability. Global guidelines should consider resource differences to improve postoperative pain management.

Keywords: analgesia; craniotomy; global anesthesia practices; neurosurgical anesthesia; survey.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

A.V.L. reports salary support from LifeCenter Northwest. The remaining authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

References

    1. Dewan MC, Rattani A, Fieggen G, et al. Global neurosurgery: the current capacity and deficit in the provision of essential neurosurgical care. Executive Summary of the Global Neurosurgery Initiative at the Program in Global Surgery and Social Change. J Neurosurg. 2018;130:1055–1064. doi:10.3171/2017.11.JNS171500 - DOI
    1. Leslie K, Troedel S, Irwin K, et al. Quality of recovery from anesthesia in neurosurgical patients. Anesthesiology. 2003;99:1158–1165. doi:10.1097/00000542-200311000-00024 - DOI
    1. Basali A, Mascha EJ, Kalfas I, et al. Relation between perioperative hypertension and intracranial hemorrhage after craniotomy. Anesthesiology. 2000;93:48–54. doi:10.1097/00000542-200007000-00012 - DOI
    1. Abate Shiferaw A, Negash AY, Tirsit A, et al. Perioperative care and outcomes of patients with brain tumors undergoing elective craniotomy: experience from an Ethiopian Tertiary-Care Hospital. World Neurosurg. 2024;181:e434–e446. doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2023.10.077 - DOI
    1. Johnson AP, Mahaffey R, Egan R, et al. Perspectives, perceptions and experiences in postoperative pain management in developing countries: a focus group study conducted in Rwanda. Pain Res Manag. 2015;20:255–260. doi:10.1155/2015/297384 - DOI

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources