Real-life characteristics and management of patients with fibrosing interstitial lung disease: INSIGHTS-ILD registry
- PMID: 40491463
- PMCID: PMC12147108
- DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00926-2024
Real-life characteristics and management of patients with fibrosing interstitial lung disease: INSIGHTS-ILD registry
Abstract
Background: This study aims to report real-life data on the characteristics and treatment patterns of patients with fibrosing interstitial lung disease (ILD; except idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis) across multiple specialised centres in Germany. Eligibility criteria included ILD affecting >10% of lung parenchyma on high-resolution computed tomography, a single breath diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide (D LCO) ≤80% predicted and active treatment of lung disease.
Methods: As of the interim analysis cut-off, 655 patients (mean±sd age 65.9±11.7 years, 54.5% male) were included. The most common ILD subtypes were fibrosing hypersensitivity pneumonitis (31.2%), fibrosing ILD (22.0%), rheumatoid arthritis and connective tissue disease ILDs (13.0%) and unclassifiable fibrosing ILD (13.0%).
Results: Lung function metrics included total lung capacity at 68.3±17.6% predicted, forced vital capacity at 69.8±19.8% predicted, forced expiratory volume in 1 s at 73.7±19.5% predicted and D LCO at 33.8±15.6% predicted. Current treatments included oral steroids (62.6%), antifibrotic therapy (50.7%), azathioprine (14.4%), methotrexate (10.2%) and mycophenolate mofetil (11.1%). Patients on antifibrotic therapy were typically older at diagnosis and registry inclusion, more often male, had more comorbidities, a lower 6-min walk distance and reduced lung function metrics compared with those not on antifibrotic therapy. Notably, 27.3% of the patients on antifibrotic therapy did not meet progression criteria (INBUILD), whereas 40.1% of patients not receiving antifibrotic therapy did meet those criteria.
Conclusion: The patient characteristics observed align with those observed in randomised controlled trials and other noninterventional studies. Patients on antifibrotic therapy generally had more severe disease profiles.
Copyright ©The authors 2025.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of interest: J. Behr received honoraria for consulting and lectures from Actelion, AstraZeneca, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Ferrer, Galapagos, Novartis, Roche and Sanofi-Genzyme. The INSIGHTS-ILD study is funded by Boehringer Ingelheim, Germany. Conflict of interest: M. Kreuter received honoraria for consulting and lectures from AstraZeneca, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Ferrer, Galapagos and Roche. Conflict of interest: F. Bonella reports grants to his institution by Boehringer Ingelheim and Roche, and fees for consulting by Savara, Roche, Sanofi and Boehringer Ingelheim. Conflict of interest: D. Pittrow received consultancy fees from Alfasigma, Amgen, Aspen, Biogen, Daiichi Sankyo, Sanofi-Genzyme, Sandoz/Novartis and MSD. Conflict of interest: B. Seeliger received honoraria for lectures from Boehringer Ingelheim, AstraZeneca, Berlin-Chemie. Conflict of interest: S. Budweiser received honoraria for lectures and consulting from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Berlin-Chemie, BMS, CSL Behring, Daiichi Sankyo, GSK, MSD, Novartis, Roche and Sanofi-Aventis. Conflict of interest: U. Neff reports lecture fees from Boehringer Ingelheim and Janssen-Cilag. Conflict of interest: F.J. Meyer received honoraria for lectures from Janssen-Cilag, Pfizer. Conflict of interest: A. Grünewaldt reports personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim for lectures and GSK for advisory boards. Conflict of interest: P. Markart reports honoraria for consulting and lectures from Roche and Boehringer Ingelheim. Conflict of interest: R. Ewert has received speaker fees and fees for participation in advisory boards from United Therapeutics, OMT, Pfizer, GlaxoSmithKline (GSK), Actelion, Novartis, Bayer HealthCare and Encysive/Pfizer; grants from Actelion and Boehringer Ingelheim; and publication support and industry-sponsored grants from OMT, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: M. Polke received honoraria for consulting and lectures from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim and Novartis. Conflict of interest: D. Koschel reports fees for consulting from Roche and Boehringer Ingelheim. Conflict of interest: The other authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Travis WD, Costabel U, Hansell DM, et al. An official American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society statement: update of the international multidisciplinary classification of the idiopathic interstitial pneumonias. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2013; 188: 733–748. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201308-1483ST - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Kreuter M, Behr J, Bonella F, et al. [Consensus guideline on the interdisciplinary diagnosis of interstitial lung diseases]. Pneumol Stuttg Ger 2023; 77: 269–302. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials