Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jun;33(3):e70061.
doi: 10.1111/ajr.70061.

Taking a Strengths-Based Approach to Mental Health in Rural Communities: What Is the Evidence for Harnessing Strengths?

Annika Luebbe  1   2 , Sandra Diminic  1   2 , Zoe Rutherford  1   2 , Hannah Roovers  1   2 , Mikesh Patel  1   2 , Harvey Whiteford  1   2
Affiliations

Taking a Strengths-Based Approach to Mental Health in Rural Communities: What Is the Evidence for Harnessing Strengths?

Annika Luebbe et al. Aust J Rural Health. 2025 Jun.

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to determine if rural community strengths identified in the literature have been causally linked to improved mental health and whether these strengths have been harnessed in interventions.

Methods: A secondary analysis of a systematic review of literature from Australia, Canada and the USA identified 28 studies that proposed a conceptual relationship to improved mental health. Studies were categorised, their distribution across a socioecological framework was assessed, and evidence of causality was evaluated.

Results: Among 28 studies, 24 were analytical and focused mainly on community strengths, with four interventional studies that addressed both personnel and community strengths. None established a causal relationship, including those that harnessed strengths in interventions.

Conclusions: Although rural strengths have been associated with improved mental health, evidence on causality, effectiveness and mechanisms for harnessing remains limited. Strengthening the evidence base is critical to justify incorporating rural strengths into mental health commissioning.

Keywords: Australia; Canada; United States; assets; mental health; remote; resources; rural; socioecological framework; strengths.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Primary and secondary analysis PRISMA flowchart.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Rural Strengths Socioecological Framework (simplified).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Malatzky C. and Bourke L., “Re‐Producing Rural Health: Challenging Dominant Discourses and the Manifestation of Power,” Journal of Rural Studies 45 (2016): 157–164.
    1. Bourke L., Humphreys J. S., Wakerman J., and Taylor J., “From ‘Problem‐Describing’ to ‘Problem‐Solving’: Challenging the ‘Deficit’ View of Remote and Rural Health,” Australian Journal of Rural Health 18, no. 5 (2010): 205–209. - PubMed
    1. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare , “Mental Health Services in Australia [Internet],” https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/mental‐health‐services/mental‐health‐ser... (2021).
    1. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare , “Suicide and Hospitalised Self‐Harm in Australia: Trends and 0Analysis [Internet],” https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/injury/suicide‐hospitalised‐self‐harm‐in... (2014).
    1. Australian Government , Rural and Remote Health—Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, 2023).

Publication types

Grants and funding