Diversity of flower structure and development correlates with inflorescence morphology in maples (Acer, Sapindaceae, Sapindales)
- PMID: 40492826
- DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcaf097
Diversity of flower structure and development correlates with inflorescence morphology in maples (Acer, Sapindaceae, Sapindales)
Abstract
Background and aims: Acer, one of the largest genera of Sapindaceae, is well-known for its diverse inflorescence and flower morphologies. Structural diversity of maples makes this genus a wonderful model to explore morphogenetic interaction between inflorescence and flower construction.
Methods: We investigated the development and structure of inflorescences and flowers using scanning electron microscopy in ten species of Acer from nine (of 17) sections. Observations are interpreted in the framework of molecular phylogenies.
Key results: Inflorescences are represented by panicles, thyrsoids, botryoids and sciadioids. The evolutionary transition from thyrsoids or panicles to racemose inflorescences resulted in the loss of floral prophylls, another sequence of floral organ initiation and often the acquisition of a new flower groundplan. The main structural transformations are changes in the floral merism and the number of stamens caused by changes in the shape and size of the floral meristem. The order of sepal initiation, the position of the median sepal and flower orientation are largely related to mechanical pressures within the floral bud associated with variations in the inflorescence construction. The gynoecium position is also variable. In species with thyrsoids or panicles, the carpel position depends on the first sepal position or on the flower position within the inflorescence. In species with racemose inflorescences, the gynoecium is always inserted in the transverse plane.
Conclusions: The evolutionary transition from branched to racemose inflorescences was followed by changes in the geometry of floral meristem and ultimately resulted in considerable changes in flower construction and development. The presence of floral prophylls and their developmental dynamics is labile among species of Acer. Inflorescence construction represents not only an important taxonomic marker but also a key feature that probably defines the diversity of floral construction and development in Acer and Sapindaceae as a whole.
Keywords: flower; flower development; flower groundplan; inflorescence; morphogenesis; ontogenetic pattern; organ initiation sequence.
© The Author(s) 2025. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Annals of Botany Company. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.
Similar articles
-
Racemose inflorescences of monocots: structural and morphogenetic interaction at the flower/inflorescence level.Ann Bot. 2013 Nov;112(8):1553-66. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcs246. Epub 2012 Nov 20. Ann Bot. 2013. PMID: 23172413 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Towards an ontogenetic understanding of inflorescence diversity.Ann Bot. 2013 Nov;112(8):1523-42. doi: 10.1093/aob/mct009. Epub 2013 Feb 27. Ann Bot. 2013. PMID: 23445936 Free PMC article.
-
Flowers and inflorescences of the seagrass Posidonia (Posidoniaceae, Alismatales).Am J Bot. 2012 Oct;99(10):1592-608. doi: 10.3732/ajb.1200227. Epub 2012 Oct 2. Am J Bot. 2012. PMID: 23032814
-
Evolution and development of inflorescences and floral symmetry in Solanaceae.Am J Bot. 2022 May;109(5):746-767. doi: 10.1002/ajb2.1864. Epub 2022 May 26. Am J Bot. 2022. PMID: 35619567 Free PMC article.
-
The interplay between inflorescence development and function as the crucible of architectural diversity.Ann Bot. 2013 Nov;112(8):1477-93. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcs252. Epub 2012 Dec 13. Ann Bot. 2013. PMID: 23243190 Free PMC article. Review.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources