Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2025 Jul;34(7):2739-2749.
doi: 10.1007/s00586-025-09039-w. Epub 2025 Jun 10.

Direct vertebral rotation (DVR) spinal instrumentation for the correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis Lenke 5 C

Emmanuel Alonge  1   2 , Gengming Zhang  3   4 , HongQi Zhang  3   4 , Chaofeng Guo  3   4
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Direct vertebral rotation (DVR) spinal instrumentation for the correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis Lenke 5 C

Emmanuel Alonge et al. Eur Spine J. 2025 Jul.

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of selecting the lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV) with extended upper instrumented vertebra (UIV) using the direct vertebral rotation (DVR) technique in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) Lenke type 5 C.

Materials and methods: A total of 120 patients with AIS Lenke 5 C with a lower-end vertebra (LEV) at L4 were prospectively enrolled and randomized into two groups based on the planned LIV: L3 (n = 44) or L4 (n = 50). All patients underwent posterior instrumentation with the DVR technique, with the upper instrumented vertebra (UIV) positioned at the upper end vertebra (UEV) + 1 or + 2. The final LIV was determined intraoperatively based on fluoroscopic assessment of disc alignment after DVR correction. Clinical and radiographic outcomes, including coronal balance, sagittal alignment, and complications, were evaluated preoperatively, at six months post-surgery, and at a minimum three-year follow-up.

Result: The mean follow-up duration was 39.8 ± 3 months for both groups, with no significant difference between them (P = 0.782). Coronal balance correction rates were comparable between the L3 and L4 groups, showing no significant differences at the final follow-up (P > 0.05). However, the number of fused segments differed significantly, with an average of 7.8 levels in the L3 group and 8.7 levels in the L4 group (P = 0.001). The distance between the central sacral vertical line (CSVL) and the L3 inner pedicle on convex side-bending films was the primary parameter for selecting L3 as the lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV). Notably, no complications such as adding-on or distal junctional kyphosis were observed in both groups.

Conclusion: Selecting the LIV at L3, when feasible based on intraoperative disc alignment, can preserve spinal mobility and reduce the number of fused segments without compromising correction outcomes. The CSVL-L3 inner pedicle distance on preoperative convex side-bending films is a useful predictor for the selection of appropriate LIV level for AIS Lenke 5 C with DVR. These findings highlight the importance of individualized LIV selection and intraoperative assessment in optimizing outcomes for patients with AIS Lenke 5 C. Additionally, raising the upper instrumented vertebra (UIV) enhances the correction of the thoracic curve, levels the rib hump, and improves shoulder balance in patients with AIS Lenke 5 C.

Keywords: Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis; Direct vertebrae rotation; Lenke 5C; Posterior only.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests. Ethical statement: All named authors meet the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) criteria for authorship for this article, take responsibility for the integrity of the work as a whole, and approve this version to be published. Ethical issues: The ethical committee for XXX University approved the study, and informed consent was obtained from all subjects and/or legal guardian(s). Furthermore, all methods were performed per our hospital’s relevant guidelines and regulations.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Oba H, Takahashi J, Kobayashi S et al (2019) Upper instrumented vertebra to the right of the lowest instrumented vertebra as a predictor of an increase in the main thoracic curve after selective posterior fusion for the thoracolumbar/lumbar curve in Lenke type 5 C adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: mul. J Neurosurg Spine 31:857–864. https://doi.org/10.3171/2019.5.SPINE181469 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Yanik HS, Ketenci IE, Erdem S (2023) Lowest instrumented vertebrae selection in posterior fusion of Lenke 3 C/6 C adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: L3 versus L4, when LEV is L4. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 143:5583–5588. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-023-04872-4 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lee CS, Ha JK, Hwang CJ et al (2016) Is it enough to stop distal fusion at L3 in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with major thoracolumbar/lumbar curves? Eur Spine J 25:3256–3264. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-015-4373-4 - DOI - PubMed
    1. O’Donnell C, Michael N, Pan X et al (2018) Anterior spinal fusion and posterior spinal fusion both effectively treat Lenke type 5 curves in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: A multicenter study**. Spine Deform 6:231–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspd.2017.09.054 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Seki S, Kawaguchi Y, Nakano M et al (2016) Rod rotation and differential rod contouring followed by direct vertebral rotation for treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: effect on thoracic and thoracolumbar or lumbar curves assessed with intraoperative computed tomography. Spine J 16:365–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2015.11.032 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources