Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jun 10.
doi: 10.1002/art.43266. Online ahead of print.

Efficacy and Safety of ABBV-154 for the Treatment of Active Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Phase 2b, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial

Affiliations

Efficacy and Safety of ABBV-154 for the Treatment of Active Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Phase 2b, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial

Frank Buttgereit et al. Arthritis Rheumatol. .

Abstract

Objective: Despite the availability of biologic and targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (b/tsDMARDs) to treat rheumatoid arthritis (RA), many patients do not experience optimized disease control. Glucocorticoids are effective but have safety risks. ABBV-154, an antibody-drug conjugate, is made up of adalimumab linked to a glucocorticoid receptor modulator. This phase 2b study evaluated the efficacy and safety of ABBV-154 in patients with moderately to severely active RA receiving background methotrexate with inadequate response to at least one prior b/tsDMARD.

Methods: Patients were randomized 1:1:1:1:1 to subcutaneous ABBV-154 40, 150, or 340 mg every other week; 340 mg every 4 weeks; or placebo. The primary endpoint was achieving 50% improvement in the American College of Rheumatology response criteria (ACR50) at week 12; secondary endpoints included achieving the ACR20 and ACR70 criteria. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were monitored. Clinical development of ABBV-154 was discontinued; the study was terminated early.

Results: Overall, 472 patients were treated. At week 12, more patients achieved ACR50 (primary endpoint) with ABBV-154 (25.5%-44.4% across dose groups) versus placebo (6.3%; all P < 0.001). ACR20 response rates were higher in all ABBV-154 treatment groups versus placebo (P < 0.001). Most ABBV-154 groups achieved the other secondary endpoints. For all ABBV-154 doses, TEAEs rates through week 12 were similar to placebo. Ten serious infection TEAEs occurred in the ABBV-154 groups.

Conclusion: ABBV-154 demonstrated superior efficacy over placebo in patients with RA and inadequate response to prior b/tsDMARDs. TEAE rates in all ABBV-154 arms were comparable with placebo. These findings provide useful insights into the design of new antibody-drug conjugates for RA.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Smolen JS, Aletaha D, Barton A, et al. Rheumatoid arthritis. Nat Rev Dis Primers 2018;4(1):18001.
    1. Smolen JS, Landewé RBM, Bergstra SA, et al. EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with synthetic and biological disease‐modifying antirheumatic drugs: 2022 update. Ann Rheum Dis 2023;82(1):3–18.
    1. Singh JA. Treatment guidelines in rheumatoid arthritis. Rheum Dis Clin North Am 2022;48(3):679–689.
    1. Fraenkel L, Bathon JM, England BR, et al. 2021 American College of Rheumatology guideline for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol 2021;73(7):1108–1123.
    1. Smolen JS, Breedveld FC, Burmester GR, et al. Treating rheumatoid arthritis to target: 2014 update of the recommendations of an international task force. Ann Rheum Dis 2016;75(1):3–15.

LinkOut - more resources