Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Aug;68(8):711-723.
doi: 10.1002/ajim.23742. Epub 2025 Jun 10.

Risk of Mortality From Esophageal Cancer Among US Poultry Workers, 1950-2019

Affiliations

Risk of Mortality From Esophageal Cancer Among US Poultry Workers, 1950-2019

Leanna Delhey et al. Am J Ind Med. 2025 Aug.

Abstract

Background: While research suggests poultry industry workers have an increased risk of cancer mortality, little is known about their risk of esophageal cancer mortality. We investigated the association between working with poultry and esophageal cancer mortality while concurrently investigating other occupational and nonoccupational risk factors amongst poultry industry workers.

Methods: We conducted a case-cohort analysis from a cohort of unionized workers in the United States (N = 46,816) and conducted follow-up for mortality from 1950 to 2019 with the National Death Index. Cases were those who died of esophageal cancer and a sub-cohort was randomly selected (N = 2666) for further analysis. We interviewed participants and relatives about their work and personal life. We used multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression to estimate the hazard of esophageal cancer mortality due to working with poultry among the full cohort and weighted regression for the sub-cohort and those interviewed. We conducted exploratory analyses to estimate hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for each interview question, adjusted for confounders, and computed a false discovery rate (FDR).

Results: In the full and sub-cohort, working in a poultry plant was associated with an increased hazard of esophageal cancer mortality (HR = 1.62, 95% CI = 1.05, 2.50; and HR = 1.65, 95% CI = 1.03, 2.65, respectively). Among survey respondents, working in a poultry plant appeared to decrease the risk of esophageal cancer mortality (HR = 0.67; 95% CI = 0.34, 1.35).

Conclusions: Working in poultry plants may increase the risk of death from esophageal cancer, but further research is needed to validate these findings and explore potential mechanisms.

Keywords: esophageal cancer; food industry workers; lifestyle factors; occupational exposure; poultry; poultry slaughtering.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study populations and data collection timeline. Black bar: All identified unionized members employed from January 1, 1950, to December 31, 1989 (full cohort). Dark gray bar: Follow‐up occurred from enrollment through death or December 31, 2019, to determine vital status. Light gray bar: *CATI‐Computer‐assisted telephone interviews. Wave 1 targeted all members in the sub‐cohort and cases identified as of 2010. Wave 2 targeted only cases. Sub‐cohort included those randomly selected from the full cohort. Cases included those who had died of esophageal cancer.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Study population flowchart. CATI, computer assisted interview; UFCW, United Food and Commercial Workers; Wave 1, 2010−2012, Wave 2, 2019−2021.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Directed acyclic graph (DAG) of the effect of poultry exposure on esophageal cancer mortality.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals for esophageal cancer mortality associated with working in the poultry industry. Model 1 is adjusted for age, gender, and race. Model 2 is adjusted for age, sex, race, tobacco use, alcohol intoxication, regular exercise, and weekly medication use.
Figure 5
Figure 5
p value plot for the obtained hazard associated with each interview question and esophageal cancer mortality. (A) Adjusted for age, sex, and race. (B) Adjusted for age, sex, race, tobacco use, alcohol intoxication, regular exercise, and weekly medication use.

Similar articles

References

    1. Johnson E. S., Ndetan H., and Lo K. M., “Cancer Mortality in Poultry Slaughtering/Processing Plant Workers Belonging to a Union Pension Fund,” Environmental Research 110, no. 6 (2010): 588–594, 10.1016/j.envres.2010.05.010. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Felini M., Preacely N., Shah N., et al., “A Case‐Cohort Study of Lung Cancer in Poultry and Control Workers: Occupational Findings,” Occupational and Environmental Medicine 69, no. 3 (2012): 191–197, 10.1136/oemed-2011-100310. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bangara S., Felini M. J., Aryal S., Sterling D., and Johnson E. S., “Risk of Hematopoietic Cancer Associated Mortality Among Workers in the Poultry Slaughtering and Processing Industries,” Clinical Cancer Research 21, no. 17 (2015): A27.
    1. Netto G. F. and Johnson E. S., “Mortality in Workers in Poultry Slaughtering/Processing Plants: The Missouri Poultry Cohort Study,” Occupational and Environmental Medicine 60, no. 10 (2003): 784–788, 10.1136/oem.60.10.784. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. “Poultry‐Production and Value 2020 Summary,” Economic Research Service, 2021, accessed October 11, 2022, https://www.nass.usda.gov/Publications/Todays_Reports/reports/plva0421.pdf.