Evaluation of the efficacy of mini-sling in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence through patient-reported outcomes and transperineal ultrasonography
- PMID: 40495518
- PMCID: PMC12152813
- DOI: 10.4274/jtgga.galenos.2025.2024-8-7
Evaluation of the efficacy of mini-sling in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence through patient-reported outcomes and transperineal ultrasonography
Abstract
Objective: Single-incision slings, such as Contasure-Needleless® (C-NDL), were developed to improve surgical treatment success in stress urinary incontinence (SUI). However, more evidence is needed to describe the outcomes of mini-sling procedures as an alternative to classical mid-urethral slings. The aim was to evaluate the short-term outcomes of the mini-sling procedure using C-NDL in the surgical treatment of SUI patients.
Material and methods: This was a single-center, prospective study including 24 patients with SUI who underwent C-NDL. Michigan Incontinence Severity Index (M-ISI) questionnaire, the Female Sexual Function Index, and the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) questionnaire were applied, as well as trans-perineal ultrasound evaluations at baseline, one month and six months postoperatively.
Results: The PGI-I index showed that 54.17% of participants described their post-operative recovery as "very much better" and 29.17% as "much better". Significant improvements were observed in all SUI and M-ISI-related results. No significant differences were detected in terms of FSFI. Complications were reported as de novo urgency in 4 (16.67%) patients, mesh erosion in 2 (8.33%) patients, and pelvic pain and infection in 1 patient each (4.17%). The mean distance of the mini-sling mesh to the urethra was found to be 5.51±2.3 mm at one month and 4.69±1.85 mm at six months after surgery (p=0.006). The mean urethral rotation angle was decreased following surgery (p<0.001). No significant differences were observed between patients with and without cure regarding any of the examined variables.
Conclusion: For SUI treatment, the C-NDL procedure is a safe and effective method with few complications and high subjective cure rates on short-term follow-up (6 months).
Keywords: Urinary incontinence; patient reported outcome measures; postoperative complications; stress; suburethral slings; ultrasonography.
Copyright© 2025 The Author. Published by Galenos Publishing House on behalf of Turkish-German Gynecological Association.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of Interest: No conflict of interest is declared by the authors.
Similar articles
-
Single-incision mini-slings versus standard synthetic mid-urethral slings for surgical treatment of stress urinary incontinence in women: The SIMS RCT.Health Technol Assess. 2022 Dec;26(47):1-190. doi: 10.3310/BTSA6148. Health Technol Assess. 2022. PMID: 36520097 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
A randomized comparison of a single-incision needleless (Contasure-needleless®) mini-sling versus an inside-out transobturator (Contasure-KIM®) mid-urethral sling in women with stress urinary incontinence: 24-month follow-up results.Int Urogynecol J. 2018 Sep;29(9):1387-1395. doi: 10.1007/s00192-018-3624-4. Epub 2018 Mar 16. Int Urogynecol J. 2018. PMID: 29549394 Clinical Trial.
-
A randomized prospective comparison of the needleless mini-sling "hammock" and "U-shape" configurations for management of stress urinary incontinence: 18 month follow-up results.Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2018 Jun;297(6):1483-1493. doi: 10.1007/s00404-018-4755-z. Epub 2018 Mar 19. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2018. PMID: 29556707 Clinical Trial.
-
Contasure-needleless single incision slings versus transobturator slings (TOT/TVT-O) for female patients with stress urinary incontinence: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC Urol. 2020 May 6;20(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s12894-020-00622-5. BMC Urol. 2020. PMID: 32375733 Free PMC article.
-
Traditional suburethral sling operations for urinary incontinence in women.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jan 28;1(1):CD001754. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001754.pub5. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020. PMID: 31990055 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Abufaraj M, Xu T, Cao C, Siyam A, Isleem U, Massad A, et al. Prevalence and trends in urinary incontinence among women in the United States, 2005-2018. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021;225:166. - PubMed
-
- Basak T, Kok G , Guvenc G. Prevalence, risk factors and quality of life in Turkish women with urinary incontinence: a synthesis of the literature. International nursing review. 2013:60. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources