Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Sep 1;282(3):371-381.
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000006785. Epub 2025 Jun 11.

First National Effort to Optimize the Performance of Cancer Surgery by the American College of Surgeons Commission on Cancer and Cancer Surgery Standards Program: Early Results After Implementation of the Operative Standards

Matthew H G Katz  1 , Amanda B Francescatti  2 , Timothy W Mullett  3 , James Harris  4 , Aaron D Bleznak  5   6 , Heidi Nelson  2 , Ronald J Weigel  2   7 , Erin K Reuter  2 , Bell M Pastore  2 , Elizabeth C Funk  2 , Kelley Chan  2   8 , Peter J Carpenter  2 , William R Burns  9 , Mediget Teshome  10 , Timothy J Vreeland  11 , Kelly K Hunt  12 , Tina J Hieken  13
Affiliations

First National Effort to Optimize the Performance of Cancer Surgery by the American College of Surgeons Commission on Cancer and Cancer Surgery Standards Program: Early Results After Implementation of the Operative Standards

Matthew H G Katz et al. Ann Surg. .

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the first 3 years of compliance with the American College of Surgeons Commission on Cancer (CoC) Operative Standards.

Background: CoC implemented evidence-based standards to improve the quality of sentinel lymph node biopsy and axillary lymph node dissection for breast cancer (operative standards 5.3 and 5.4), wide local excision for melanoma (5.5), colectomy for colon cancer (5.6), proctectomy for rectal cancer (5.7), and pulmonary resection for lung cancer (5.8) at ∼1400 programs treating >74% of US cancer patients. Each operative standard defines a technical element of the operation and structured documentation.

Methods: Compliance data are from site visits conducted between January 1, 2022, and December 31, 2024 (implementation/site visits began in 2021/2022 for 5.7 and 5.8 and 2023/2024 for 5.3-5.6). Compliance with each operative standard was determined by evaluation of 7 operative (5.3-5.6) or pathology (5.7, 5.8) reports. Deficiency in technical performance, documentation, or both was considered noncompliance.

Results: Reviewers conducted 974 site visits of Comprehensive Community (44%), Community (23%), Academic Comprehensive (16%), network (12%), NCI-Designated Comprehensive (4%), and other (1%) cancer programs. Program compliance rates ranged from 53% to 88%. Documentation noncompliance was more common for standards 5.3 to 5.6 (based on operative reports), and technical noncompliance was more common for 5.7 and 5.8 (based on pathology reports). Compliance significantly ( P =0.006) varied by program type for 5.8 (highest: 66% at NCI-designated Comprehensive programs; lowest: 37% at Community Cancer programs).

Conclusions: Early compliance with CoC operative standards varied, indicating local and large-scale national quality improvement efforts are needed.

Keywords: american college of surgeons; commission on cancer; operative standards; quality; technique.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors report no conflicts of interest.

References

    1. American Cancer Institute. Standard of Care. NCI Dictionary of Cancer Terms [ACI web site]. Accessed 2025 Mar 25. https://www.cancer.gov/publications/dictionaries/cancer-terms/def/standa...
    1. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN Guidelines V1.2022, Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma [NCCN web site]. 2022. https://www.nccn.org/guidelines/category_1
    1. Khorana AA, Mangu PB, Berlin J, et al. Potentially Curable Pancreatic Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34:2541–2556.
    1. Smith TJ, Hillner BE. Ensuring quality cancer care by the use of clinical practice guidelines and critical pathways. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19:2886–2897.
    1. American College of Surgeons, Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology. Operative Standards for Cancer Surgery, Vol. 1 Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Health; 2015.

LinkOut - more resources