Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jun 10;23(6):e9465.
doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2025.9465. eCollection 2025 Jun.

Safety and efficacy of a feed additive consisting of Bacillus velezensis NRRL B-67647, Bacillus pumilus NRRL B-67648 and Bacillus licheniformis NRRL B-67649 (Microsaf®) for chickens for fattening, other poultry for fattening and ornamental birds (S.I. Lesaffre)

Safety and efficacy of a feed additive consisting of Bacillus velezensis NRRL B-67647, Bacillus pumilus NRRL B-67648 and Bacillus licheniformis NRRL B-67649 (Microsaf®) for chickens for fattening, other poultry for fattening and ornamental birds (S.I. Lesaffre)

EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) et al. EFSA J. .

Abstract

Following a request from the European Commission, EFSA was asked to deliver a scientific opinion on the safety and efficacy of Microsaf® when used as a feed additive for chickens for fattening, other poultry for fattening and ornamental birds. The product under assessment is based on viable cells/spores of Bacillus velezensis NRRL B-67647, Bacillus pumilus NRRL B-67648 and Bacillus licheniformis NRRL B-67649. The three bacterial species are considered by EFSA to be suitable for the qualified presumption of safety approach to safety assessment. As the identity of the strains was clearly established, no acquired antimicrobial resistance determinants of concern were detected and the lack of toxigenic potential was corroborated, the FEEDAP Panel considered the use of the active agents safe for the target species, consumers and the environment. Since no concerns are expected from the other components of the additive, the Panel concluded that Microsaf® is also considered safe for the target species, consumers and the environment. Regarding user safety, the additive is not irritant to the skin or eyes provided it is formulated with only calcium carbonate. The additive should be considered skin and respiratory sensitisers, and any exposure via skin or respiratory tract is considered a risk. The FEEDAP Panel concludes that the additive has the potential to improve the zootechnical performance of chickens for fattening at a proposed minimum inclusion level of 3 × 107 total CFU/kg of complete feedingstuffs. These results are extrapolable to other poultry for fattening and ornamental birds. Microsaf® is compatible with diclazuril, narasin, maduramicin ammonium, salinomycin sodium, monensin sodium, robenidine hydrochloride and the combination narasin/nicarbazin, lasalocid and halofuginone.

Keywords: Bacillus licheniformis NRRL B‐67649; Bacillus pumilus NRRL B‐67648; Bacillus velezensis NRRL B‐67647; efficacy; gut flora stabilisers; safety; zootechnical additives.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Dunlap, C. A. , Kim, S. J. , Kwon, S. W. , & Rooney, A. P. (2016). Bacillus velezensis is not a later heterotypic synonym of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens; Bacillus methylotrophicus, Bacillus amyloliquefaciens subsp. plantarum and ‘Bacillus oryzicola’ are later heterotypic synonyms of Bacillus velezensis based on phylogenomics. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, 66(3), 1212–1217. 10.1099/ijsem.0.000858 - DOI - PubMed
    1. EFSA (European Food Safety Authority) . (2021). EFSA statement on the requirements for whole genome sequence analysis of microorganisms intentionally used in the food chain. EFSA Journal, 19(7), 6506. 10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6506 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. EFSA BIOHAZ Panel (EFSA Panel on Biological Hazards) , Koutsoumanis, K. , Allende, A. , Álvarez‐Ordóñez, A. , Bolton, D. , Bover‐Cid, S. , Chemaly, M. , De Cesare, A. , Hilbert, F. , Lindqvist, R. , Nauta, M. , Peixe, L. , Ru, G. , Simmons, M. , Skandamis, P. , Suffredini, E. , Cocconcelli, P. S. , Fernández Escámez, P. S. , Prieto Maradona, M. , … Herman, L. (2023). Scientific opinion on the update of the list of qualified presumption of safety (QPS) recommended microorganisms intentionally added to food or feed as notified to EFSA. EFSA Journal, 21(1), 7747. 10.2903/j.efsa.2023.7747 - DOI
    1. EFSA FEEDAP Panel (EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed) , Rychen, G. , Aquilina, G. , Azimonti, G. , Bampidis, V. , Bastos, M. L. , Bories, G. , Chesson, A. , Cocconcelli, P. S. , Flachowsky, G. , Gropp, J. , Kolar, B. , Kouba, M. , López‐Alonso, M. , López Puente, S. , Mantovani, A. , Mayo, B. , Ramos, F. , Saarela, M. , … Innocenti, M. L. (2017). Guidance on the identity, characterisation and conditions of use of feed additives. EFSA Journal, 15(10), 5023. 10.2903/j.efsa.2017.5023 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. EFSA FEEDAP Panel (EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed) , Rychen, G. , Aquilina, G. , Azimonti, G. , Bampidis, V. , Bastos, M. L. , Bories, G. , Chesson, A. , Cocconcelli, P. S. , Flachowsky, G. , Gropp, J. , Kolar, B. , Kouba, M. , López‐Alonso, M. , López Puente, S. , Mantovani, A. , Mayo, B. , Ramos, F. , Saarela, M. , … Galobart, J. (2018). Guidance on the characterisation of microorganisms used as feed additives or as production organisms. EFSA Journal, 16(3), 5206. 10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5206 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources