Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 May 14;31(18):104525.
doi: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i18.104525.

Triglyceride-glucose index in predicting gastric cancer prognosis: A need for caution

Affiliations

Triglyceride-glucose index in predicting gastric cancer prognosis: A need for caution

Yi-Fan Zhao et al. World J Gastroenterol. .

Abstract

Gastric cancer (GC) remains one of the leading causes of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Accurate prognostic assessment, which is essential for enhancing overall survival (OS), currently depends on pathologic and clinical staging. This underscores the urgent need for reliable and real-time prognostic biomarkers. The triglyceride-glucose (TyG) index, a readily available marker of insulin resistance, has recently emerged as a potential prognostic tool in GC. Numerous studies have consistently shown a significant association between elevated TyG levels and inferior OS as well as progression-free survival. Despite these promising findings, several challenges must be addressed before the TyG index can be widely adopted in clinical practice. Firstly, the TyG index lacks cancer-specificity, reflecting broader metabolic disturbances commonly observed in conditions such as obesity, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease. This lack of specificity complicates its interpretation in oncological settings. Additionally, the cutoff values for TyG index vary across studies, hindering the establishment of a standardized threshold for clinical application. While the TyG index provides valuable insights into a patient's metabolic health, its limited cancer specificity necessitates cautious use when evaluating the prognosis of GC treatment.

Keywords: Gastric cancer; Glycolipid metabolism; Overall survival; Prognostic biomarker; Progression-free survival; Triglyceride-glucose index.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict-of-interest statement: All the authors report no relevant conflicts of interest for this article.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The triglyceride-glucose index, derived from fasting glucose and triglyceride levels, has emerged as a promising prognostic indicator for gastric cancer. Insulin resistance (IR) characterized by chronic hyperglycemia and hyperinsulinemia, modulates key signaling pathways including PI3K/Akt, NF-κB, and AMPK. The triglyceride-glucose (TyG) index may serve as an indirect marker of IR through these pathways, thereby playing a crucial role in various gastric cancer (GC) cell processes including proliferation, apoptosis, invasion, and metastasis. Elevated TyG levels have been correlated with improved overall survival and progression-free survival in GC patients. However, several limitations restrict its broader application, including its lack of cancer specificity, inconsistent cutoff values across studies, and the poorly understood mechanisms by which IR influences cancer progression. This article highlights the necessity of a multifactorial approach to enhance prognostic accuracy and guide personalized treatment strategies. Future research is imperative to validate the clinical utility of the TyG index and investigate its integration with other biomarkers to optimize patient outcomes in GC. TyG: Triglyceride-glucose; OS: Overall survival; PFS: Progression-free survival.

References

    1. Ajani JA, D'Amico TA, Bentrem DJ, Chao J, Cooke D, Corvera C, Das P, Enzinger PC, Enzler T, Fanta P, Farjah F, Gerdes H, Gibson MK, Hochwald S, Hofstetter WL, Ilson DH, Keswani RN, Kim S, Kleinberg LR, Klempner SJ, Lacy J, Ly QP, Matkowskyj KA, McNamara M, Mulcahy MF, Outlaw D, Park H, Perry KA, Pimiento J, Poultsides GA, Reznik S, Roses RE, Strong VE, Su S, Wang HL, Wiesner G, Willett CG, Yakoub D, Yoon H, McMillian N, Pluchino LA. Gastric Cancer, Version 2.2022, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2022;20:167–192. - PubMed
    1. Torre LA, Siegel RL, Ward EM, Jemal A. Global Cancer Incidence and Mortality Rates and Trends--An Update. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2016;25:16–27. - PubMed
    1. GBD 2017 Stomach Cancer Collaborators. The global, regional, and national burden of stomach cancer in 195 countries, 1990-2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease study 2017. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020;5:42–54. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kunz PL, Gubens M, Fisher GA, Ford JM, Lichtensztajn DY, Clarke CA. Long-term survivors of gastric cancer: a California population-based study. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:3507–3515. - PubMed
    1. Ajani JA, D'Amico TA, Almhanna K, Bentrem DJ, Chao J, Das P, Denlinger CS, Fanta P, Farjah F, Fuchs CS, Gerdes H, Gibson M, Glasgow RE, Hayman JA, Hochwald S, Hofstetter WL, Ilson DH, Jaroszewski D, Johung KL, Keswani RN, Kleinberg LR, Korn WM, Leong S, Linn C, Lockhart AC, Ly QP, Mulcahy MF, Orringer MB, Perry KA, Poultsides GA, Scott WJ, Strong VE, Washington MK, Weksler B, Willett CG, Wright CD, Zelman D, McMillian N, Sundar H. Gastric Cancer, Version 3.2016, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2016;14:1286–1312. - PubMed