Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate versus entecavir on the prognosis of hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma after surgical resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- PMID: 40496611
- PMCID: PMC12149102
- DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1462794
Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate versus entecavir on the prognosis of hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma after surgical resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
Background and aim: Entecavir (ETV) and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) are first-line antiviral treatment methods for chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. However, the different effects of TDF versus ETV on the prognosis of HBV-related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after surgical resection remain controversial. We conducted this meta-analysis to assess the differences of TDF versus ETV in recurrence and survival for HBV-related HCC after liver resection.
Methods: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed and Web of Science for the related studies published before January 2025. Meta-analysis was performed by use of a random-effects model.
Results: A total of 15 studies were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled results showed that TDF was associated with better recurrence-free survival (RFS) (HR= 0.79, 95% CI 0.70-0.88) and lower risk of recurrence (HR=0.73, 95% CI 0.62-0.86) than ETV in HBV-related HCC patients after surgical resection. Further analysis indicated that TDF reduced the risk of late recurrence (HR= 0.70, 95% CI 0.55-0.88) rather than early recurrence (HR= 1.00, 95% CI 0.85-1.17) compared with ETV. Also, the pooled results revealed that TDF was associated with better overall survival (OS) (HR= 0.55, 95% CI 0.41-0.74) and lower risk of overall mortality (HR= 0.55, 95% CI 0.41-0.74) than ETV.
Conclusion: This meta-analysis provided evidence that TDF has better benefits in improving survival and reducing late recurrence than ETV in HBV-related HCC patients after surgical resection.
Keywords: entecavir; hepatitis B; hepatocellular carcinoma; resection; tenofovir.
Copyright © 2025 Wang, Wu, Xiang, Liao, Jiang and Chen.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Figures



Similar articles
-
Tenofovir versus entecavir on the prognosis of hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023 Jan-Jun;17(6):623-633. doi: 10.1080/17474124.2023.2212161. Epub 2023 May 9. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023. PMID: 37148261
-
Tenofovir vs. entecavir on prognosis of hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma after curative resection.J Gastroenterol. 2022 Mar;57(3):185-198. doi: 10.1007/s00535-022-01855-x. Epub 2022 Feb 13. J Gastroenterol. 2022. PMID: 35152312
-
Tenofovir versus entecavir for tertiary prevention of hepatocellular carcinoma in chronic hepatitis B infection after curative therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.J Viral Hepat. 2023 Feb;30(2):108-115. doi: 10.1111/jvh.13766. Epub 2022 Nov 23. J Viral Hepat. 2023. PMID: 36321967
-
Tenofovir vs. Entecavir on Outcomes of Hepatitis B Virus-Related Hepatocellular Carcinoma after Radiofrequency Ablation.Viruses. 2022 Mar 22;14(4):656. doi: 10.3390/v14040656. Viruses. 2022. PMID: 35458386 Free PMC article.
-
Tenofovir versus entecavir on the prognosis of hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma: a reconstructed individual patient data meta-analysis.Front Pharmacol. 2024 Aug 22;15:1393861. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1393861. eCollection 2024. Front Pharmacol. 2024. PMID: 39239648 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources