Predictors of adverse perinatal and maternal outcomes of instrumental vaginal delivery at a tertiary setting in Ethiopia: A cross-sectional study
- PMID: 40496686
- PMCID: PMC12039594
- DOI: 10.1002/puh2.41
Predictors of adverse perinatal and maternal outcomes of instrumental vaginal delivery at a tertiary setting in Ethiopia: A cross-sectional study
Abstract
Objective: To determine the rate of instrumental vaginal delivery (IVD) and the predictors of adverse maternal and fetal outcomes associated with it in an Ethiopian setting.
Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted from October 1, 2018, to January 31, 2019, at St. Paul's Hospital Millennium Medical College (SPHMMC) (Addis Ababa, Ethiopia). Data on obstetric characteristics, perinatal and maternal outcomes of women who delivered through IVD were collected prospectively, using a structured questionnaire. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 22 and descriptive analysis was applied to analyze baseline characteristics. Multivariable logistic regression model was fitted to predict the association between short-term complications of IVD and their determinants. Odds ratio, 95% CI, and p-value < 0.05 were used to present significance of study findings.
Results: There were 3165 deliveries during the study period, out of which 241 (7.6%) were instrumental vaginal deliveries. Sequential use of instrumental delivery (AOR = 4.82 [95% CI = 2.10-27.29] and AOR = 6.43 [95% CI = 1.19-34.73], for maternal and fetal complications, respectively) was associated with increased both maternal and fetal complications. Three number of pulls during the extraction was associated with increased fetal complications (AOR = 1.19 [95% CI = 1.05-1.67]).
Conclusion: The rate of instrumental delivery rate in our setting is high with sequential use of instrumental delivery found to be associated with increased adverse maternal and fetal outcomes while three number of pulls were associated with increased fetal adverse outcomes.
Keywords: forceps delivery; instrumental delivery; perinatal complications; vacuum delivery.
© 2022 The Authors. Public Health Challenges published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declares that they have no financial or non‐financial competing interests. AFS is an Editorial Board member of Public Health Challenges and co‐author of this article. DEL is editor in chief of Public Health Challenges and co‐author of this article. They were excluded from editorial decision‐making related to the acceptance of this article for publication in the journal.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Women's satisfaction with intrapartum care in St Paul's Hospital Millennium Medical College Addis Ababa Ethiopia: a cross sectional study.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Jul 28;17(1):253. doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1428-z. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017. PMID: 28754136 Free PMC article.
-
Immediate unfavorable birth outcomes and determinants of operative vaginal delivery among mothers delivered in East Gojjam Zone Public Hospitals, North West Ethiopia: A cross-sectional study.PLoS One. 2022 Jun 1;17(6):e0268782. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268782. eCollection 2022. PLoS One. 2022. PMID: 35648789 Free PMC article.
-
Prolonged second stage of labor: Predictors of adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes in a sub-Saharan setting.Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2023 Dec;163(3):997-1004. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.14982. Epub 2023 Jul 7. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2023. PMID: 37417324
-
Maternal complication of instrumental vaginal delivery and its associated factors: Systematic review and meta-analysis.PLoS One. 2025 Apr 24;20(4):e0320003. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0320003. eCollection 2025. PLoS One. 2025. PMID: 40273174 Free PMC article.
-
Instrumental delivery: clinical practice guidelines from the French College of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians.Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011 Nov;159(1):43-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2011.06.043. Epub 2011 Jul 28. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011. PMID: 21802193 Review.
References
-
- Bailey PE. The disappearing art of instrumental delivery: time to reverse the trend. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2005; 91: 89‐96. - PubMed
-
- The Information Centre, Community Health Statistics. NHS Maternity Statistics, England: 2004–05. The Information Centre. ISBN: 1‐84636‐056‐0. Accessed 25 February 2007. Available at http://www.ic.nhs.uk/pubs/maternityeng2005/maternitystats06/file
-
- Lumbiganon P, Laopaiboon M, Gulmezoglu AM, et al. Method of delivery and pregnancy outcomes in Asia: the WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health 2007–08. Lancet. 2010; 375: 490‐499. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources