Factors associated with efficacy of occipital nerve stimulation in medically intractable chronic cluster headache
- PMID: 40497588
- DOI: 10.1111/head.14985
Factors associated with efficacy of occipital nerve stimulation in medically intractable chronic cluster headache
Abstract
Background/objective: Occipital nerve stimulation (ONS) has become an established therapy for medically intractable chronic cluster headache (MICCH), but unfortunately, one third of the patients do not respond satisfactorily. Reliable predictors of treatment success would help physicians improve indication for ONS in MICCH. Although a recent report suggested several factors that were associated with treatment failure (early onset of cluster headache [CH], chronic cluster headache [CCH], and smoking) this study was small, did not use a formal model, efficacy was poorly defined, and the follow-up was only of short duration. Here, we retrospectively sought: (i) reproduction of these associations and (ii) identification of possible other associations in our previously published double-blind randomized controlled "Occipital Nerve Stimulation in Medically Intractable Chronic Cluster Headache" (ICON) trial, and long-term follow-up, of the efficacy of ONS in MICCH.
Methods: Data from the double-blind randomized controlled ICON trial, and its prospective open-label extension, were analyzed in this prospective cohort study in the Netherlands (October 12, 2010, to December 20, 2020) for: (i) relative differences in attack frequency and (ii) subjective satisfaction with effect between baseline and at 4 and 24 weeks, and 2 and 5 years, after ONS implantation. Formal statistical models were used to: (i) verify the previously detected associations and (ii) identify possible other associations.
Results: Early onset of CH and smoking did not predict efficacy of ONS. Relative reduction in attack frequency at 24 weeks (B = 0.44, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.13-0.76; p = 0.007) and the time since onset of CCH (B = 4.04, 95% CI 1.16-6.92; p = 0.007) appeared to be the only factors that were associated with objective efficacy at 2 years, and relative attack reduction after 2 years was the only factor associated with objective efficacy at 5 years (B = 0.501, 95% CI 0.186-0.815; p = 0.003). The odds of experiencing subjective satisfaction with ONS after 2 years increased with a later debut of CCH (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.06, 95% CI 1.01-1.12; p = 0.033) and greater relative reduction in attack frequency at 24 weeks (aOR 1.02, 95% CI 1.00-1.04; p = 0.017).
Conclusion: In a controlled setting, early onset of CH, CCH, and smoking were not associated with treatment success of ONS for MICCH, as previously suggested by others in an uncontrolled setting. Early response at 24 weeks after initiation of ONS was the only factor that was associated with long-term efficacy, which was identified. Since a large proportion of patients with MICCH improve with ONS, we recommend offering ONS to all patients with MICCH.
Keywords: chronic cluster headache; medically intractable chronic cluster headache; neuromodulation; occipital nerve stimulation.
© 2025 The Author(s). Headache: The Journal of Head and Face Pain published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Headache Society.
Similar articles
-
Safety and efficacy of occipital nerve stimulation for attack prevention in medically intractable chronic cluster headache (ICON): a randomised, double-blind, multicentre, phase 3, electrical dose-controlled trial.Lancet Neurol. 2021 Jul;20(7):515-525. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(21)00101-0. Lancet Neurol. 2021. PMID: 34146510 Clinical Trial.
-
A prospective open label 2-8 year extension of the randomised controlled ICON trial on the long-term efficacy and safety of occipital nerve stimulation in medically intractable chronic cluster headache.EBioMedicine. 2023 Dec;98:104895. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2023.104895. Epub 2023 Nov 25. EBioMedicine. 2023. PMID: 38007947 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
The HortONS study. Treatment of chronic cluster headache with transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and occipital nerve stimulation: study protocol for a prospective, investigator-initiated, double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled trial.BMC Neurol. 2023 Oct 21;23(1):379. doi: 10.1186/s12883-023-03435-9. BMC Neurol. 2023. PMID: 37865755 Free PMC article.
-
Cluster headache and other TACs: Pathophysiology and neurostimulation options.Headache. 2017 Feb;57(2):327-335. doi: 10.1111/head.12874. Epub 2016 Aug 4. Headache. 2017. PMID: 28128461 Review.
-
Occipital nerve block prior to occipital nerve stimulation for refractory chronic migraine and chronic cluster headache: myth or prediction?Cephalalgia. 2015 Apr;35(4):359-62. doi: 10.1177/0333102414541685. Epub 2014 Jul 2. Cephalalgia. 2015. PMID: 24989870 Review.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Leplus A, Fontaine D, Donnet A, et al. Long‐term efficacy of occipital nerve stimulation for medically intractable cluster headache. Neurosurgery. 2020;88:375‐383.
-
- Wilbrink LA, de Coo IF, Doesborg PGG, et al. Safety and efficacy of occipital nerve stimulation for attack prevention in medically intractable chronic cluster headache (ICON): a randomised, double‐blind, multicentre, phase 3, electrical dose‐controlled trial. Lancet Neurol. 2021;20(7):515‐525.
-
- Brandt RB, Wilbrink LA, de Coo IF, et al. A prospective open label 2–8 year extension of the randomised controlled ICON trial on the long‐term efficacy and safety of occipital nerve stimulation in medically intractable chronic cluster headache. EBioMedicine. 2023;98:104895.
-
- Gordon A, Roe T, Villar‐Martínez MD, Moreno‐Ajona D, Goadsby PJ, Hoffmann J. Effectiveness and safety profile of greater occipital nerve blockade in cluster headache: a systematic review. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2024;95(1):73‐85.
-
- Membrilla JA, Roa J, Diaz‐de‐Teran J. Preventive treatment of refractory chronic cluster headache: systematic review and meta‐analysis. J Neurol. 2023;270(2):689‐710.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources