Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Aug;22(4):211-221.
doi: 10.1080/17410541.2025.2515003. Epub 2025 Jun 11.

Perceived understanding and psychosocial outcomes: employees' responses to learning results of workplace genetic testing

Affiliations

Perceived understanding and psychosocial outcomes: employees' responses to learning results of workplace genetic testing

Elizabeth Charnysh et al. Per Med. 2025 Aug.

Abstract

Aims: This study explored employees' understanding of, and psychosocial responses to, workplace genetic testing (wGT) results.

Materials & methods: Employees of a US healthcare system who underwent wGT (hereditary cancer/heart disease risk, pharmacogenomics) and received results were surveyed. We ascertained pretest education engagement, test understanding, and psychosocial responses. Regression analyses identified predictors of scores on a modified Feelings About genomiC Test Results questionnaire (positive feelings, negative emotions, and uncertainty after wGT).

Results: N = 418 employees (mean age = 44 years; 88.3% female; 80.6% white) completed the survey. Mean scores (out of 12; higher scores indicate a greater extent of each feeling) were 5.2 (SD = 2.9) for positive feelings, 1.2 (SD = 2.2) for negative emotions, and 2.0 (SD = 2.5) for uncertainty. Identifying as non-Hispanic African American/Black and receiving increased risk (cancer/heart disease) wGT results were associated with lower positive feelings and higher negative emotions and uncertainty scores (all p < 0.05). Open-ended responses indicated difficulty interpreting, recalling, and utilizing results.

Conclusions: wGT was associated with low levels of measured psychosocial harm among participants. However, results suggested a greater likelihood of negative psychosocial responses among those with increased risk of cancer/heart disease and non-Hispanic African American/Black employees. Future studies should explore strategies to ensure all employees undergoing wGT have educational and psychosocial support.

Keywords: Workplace genetic testing (wGT); direct-to-consumer (DTC) genetic testing; ethical, legal, and social implications (ELSI); hereditary cancers; hereditary cardiac conditions; pharmacogenomics (PGx); psychosocial responses; understanding.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

References

    1. Roberts JS. Assessing the Psychological Impact of Genetic Susceptibility Testing. Hastings Center Report. 2019;49(S1). doi: 10.1002/hast.1015. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kilbride MK, Domchek SM, Bradbury AR. Ethical Implications of Direct-to-Consumer Hereditary Cancer Tests. JAMA Oncol. 2018;4(10):1327–8. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.2439. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Schleit J, Naylor LV, Hisama FM. First, Do No Harm: Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing. Genet Med. 2019;21(2):510–1. doi: 10.1038/s41436-018-0071-z. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bloss CS, Wineinger NE, Darst BF, Schork NJ, Topol EJ. Impact of Direct-to-Consumer Genomic Testing at Long Term Follow-Up. J Med Genet. 2013;50:393–400. doi: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2012-101207. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Roberts JS, Gornick MC, Carere DA, et al. Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: User Motivations, Decision Making, and Perceived Utility of Results. Public Health Genomics. 2017. doi: 10.1159/000455006. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources