Prospective nationwide audit of short-term outcomes after surgery for chronic pilonidal sinus disease in the Netherlands
- PMID: 40498166
- PMCID: PMC12158824
- DOI: 10.1007/s10151-025-03159-7
Prospective nationwide audit of short-term outcomes after surgery for chronic pilonidal sinus disease in the Netherlands
Abstract
Background: The optimal surgical approach for chronic pilonidal sinus disease (PSD) remains unclear, resulting in variation in surgical practice. This study aimed to provide an overview of PSD subtypes and assess practice variation and short-term outcomes.
Methods: A nationwide prospective observational cohort study was conducted. All patients with PSD and who underwent surgery were included during a 3-month inclusion period between March 1, 2020 and March 1, 2021. Primary endpoints were PSD classification and type and frequency of surgical approach. Secondary endpoints included symptoms, complications, recurrent open wounds, wound healing rate, time to wound healing, time to resume daily activities, reasons for selecting therapy, antibiotic prophylaxis, type of anesthesia, and hospital admission.
Results: A total of 36 hospitals participated in the study, and 405 patients had chronic disease. The median follow-up period was 42 days. Mean age was 28 years and 335 (82.7%) patients were male. Simple (n = 213) and complex PSD (n = 192) was equally common. Twelve different treatment modalities were performed. Minimally invasive techniques were used the most (61.2%) and off-midline closure in only a small proportion of patients (5.7%). Minimally invasive techniques showed a significantly higher wound healing rate (41.1% vs 28.6%) and a shorter median time to closure (41 vs 78 days) compared to excision with secondary healing. They also had the shortest median time to resume daily activities (14 days).
Conclusions: Simple and complex PSD were equally common. Practice variation in surgery is substantial. Minimally invasive techniques were most frequently performed and showed good short-term outcomes.
Keywords: Excision with secondary healing; Minimally invasive techniques; Off-midline closure; Pilonidal sinus disease; Successful wound healing.
© 2025. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Conflict of interest: The authors declare no competing interests. Ethical approval: The medical ethics committee of the University Medical Center Utrecht approved the study design (protocol number 20-671/C). Informed consent: Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Figures





Similar articles
-
Dressings and topical agents for the management of open wounds after surgical treatment for sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013439. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013439.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 35593897 Free PMC article.
-
Healing by primary versus secondary intention after surgical treatment for pilonidal sinus.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Oct 17;(4):CD006213. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006213.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Jan 20;(1):CD006213. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006213.pub3. PMID: 17943897 Updated.
-
Fibrin glue for pilonidal sinus disease.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jan 13;1(1):CD011923. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011923.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017. PMID: 28085995 Free PMC article.
-
Short-term results of unroofing and marsupialization compared to the Karydakis technique in the treatment of pilonidal sinus. A randomized prospective study.Cir Esp (Engl Ed). 2025 Jan;103(1):25-33. doi: 10.1016/j.cireng.2024.10.002. Epub 2024 Oct 18. Cir Esp (Engl Ed). 2025. PMID: 39427709 Clinical Trial.
-
Endoscopic pilonidal sinus treatment versus excision with wound closure: a systematic review of the literature.Minerva Surg. 2025 Aug;80(4):314-322. doi: 10.23736/S2724-5691.25.10615-1. Epub 2025 Apr 3. Minerva Surg. 2025. PMID: 40178497
References
-
- Yildiz T, Elmas B, Yucak A, Turgut HT, Ilce Z (2017) Risk factors for pilonidal sinus disease in teenagers. Indian J Pediatr 84(2):134–138 - PubMed
-
- Hueston JT (1953) The aetiology of pilonidal sinuses. Br J Surg 41(167):307–311 - PubMed
-
- Doll D, Matevossian E, Wietelmann K, Evers T, Kriner M, Petersen S (2009) Family history of pilonidal sinus predisposes to earlier onset of disease and a 50% long-term recurrence rate. Dis Colon Rectum 52(9):1610–1615 - PubMed
-
- Brashear RI (1963) Observations on the etiology of pilonidal diseases. South Med J 56:727–729 - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources