Differences in United States Adult Dietary Patterns by Cardiometabolic Health and Socioeconomic Vulnerability
- PMID: 40499655
- DOI: 10.1016/j.tjnut.2025.06.002
Differences in United States Adult Dietary Patterns by Cardiometabolic Health and Socioeconomic Vulnerability
Abstract
Background: Naturally occurring dietary patterns are not well described among individuals with cardiovascular disease (CVD) or cardiometabolic risk factors (i.e., diabetes, hypertension, obesity, and dyslipidemia), particularly considering socioeconomic vulnerability.
Objectives: We investigated major dietary patterns in the United States and their distribution by prevalent CVD, cardiometabolic risk factors, and socioeconomic vulnerability.
Methods: This cross-sectional study analyzed data from 32,498 noninstitutionalized adults who participated in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2009-2020). We used principal component analysis to identify dietary patterns. Using multiple linear regression, we tested the association of prevalent CVD, cardiometabolic risk factors, and socioeconomic vulnerability [number of social risk factors and Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) participation status] with each pattern.
Results: Four dietary patterns were identified: processed/animal foods (high-refined grains, added sugars, meats, and dairy), prudent (high vegetables, nuts/seeds, oils, seafood, and poultry), legume, and fruit/whole grain/dairy, which together explained 29.2% of the dietary variance. After adjustment for age, gender, race and ethnicity, cohort year, and total energy intake, the processed/animals foods pattern associated (β-coefficient for difference in principal component score) positively with diabetes [0.08 (0.01, 0.14)], hypertension [0.11 (0.06, 0.16)], obesity [0.15 (0.11, 0.19)], higher social risk score (P-trend < 0.001), income-eligible SNAP nonparticipation [0.16 (0.09, 0.23)], and SNAP participation [0.23 (0.17, 0.29)]. The prudent pattern associated negatively with hypertension [-0.09 (-0.14, -0.04)], obesity [-0.11 (-0.16, -0.06)], higher social risk score (P-trend < 0.001), income-eligible SNAP nonparticipation [-0.14 (-0.21, -0.06)], and SNAP participation [-0.30 (-0.35, -0.24)]. The legume pattern was associated negatively with CVD [-0.09 (-0.15, -0.02)] and obesity [-0.08 (-0.12, -0.04)], and positively with income-eligible SNAP nonparticipation [0.11 (0.04, 0.18)]. The fruit/whole grain/dairy pattern was associated positively with diabetes [0.08 (0.01, 0.15)] and negatively with hypertension [-0.21 (-0.26, -0.15)], obesity [-0.23 (-0.28, -0.18)], higher social risk score (P-trend < 0.001), and SNAP participation [-0.19 (-0.25, -0.12)].
Conclusions: Empirical dietary patterns in the United States vary by CVD, cardiometabolic risk factors, and socioeconomic vulnerability. Initiatives to improve nutrition should consider these naturally occurring dietary patterns and their variation in key subgroups.
Keywords: cardiovascular disease; food assistance; nutrition; policy; social determinants of health.
Copyright © 2025 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of interest EJB reports financial support from the National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities. The other authors report no conflicts of interest.
Update of
-
Differences in US Adult Dietary Patterns by Cardiovascular Health and Socioeconomic Vulnerability.medRxiv [Preprint]. 2025 Jan 3:2025.01.02.25319924. doi: 10.1101/2025.01.02.25319924. medRxiv. 2025. Update in: J Nutr. 2025 Aug;155(8):2685-2699. doi: 10.1016/j.tjnut.2025.06.002. PMID: 39802791 Free PMC article. Updated. Preprint.
Similar articles
-
Differences in US Adult Dietary Patterns by Cardiovascular Health and Socioeconomic Vulnerability.medRxiv [Preprint]. 2025 Jan 3:2025.01.02.25319924. doi: 10.1101/2025.01.02.25319924. medRxiv. 2025. Update in: J Nutr. 2025 Aug;155(8):2685-2699. doi: 10.1016/j.tjnut.2025.06.002. PMID: 39802791 Free PMC article. Updated. Preprint.
-
A Measure of Nutrition Security Using the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey Dataset.JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Feb 3;8(2):e2462130. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.62130. JAMA Netw Open. 2025. PMID: 40019763 Free PMC article.
-
Associations between Food Insecurity and Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) participation with ultra-processed food intake in lower-income U.S. adolescents.J Nutr Sci. 2025 Jun 4;14:e41. doi: 10.1017/jns.2025.24. eCollection 2025. J Nutr Sci. 2025. PMID: 40568620 Free PMC article.
-
Dietary Patterns and Cardiovascular Diseases in Asia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Adv Nutr. 2024 Jul;15(7):100249. doi: 10.1016/j.advnut.2024.100249. Epub 2024 Jun 20. Adv Nutr. 2024. PMID: 39009489 Free PMC article.
-
Nutritional interventions for survivors of childhood cancer.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Aug 22;2016(8):CD009678. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009678.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016. PMID: 27545902 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources