Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
[Preprint]. 2025 Jun 5:rs.3.rs-6763050.
doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-6763050/v1.

Development and Psychometric Properties of a Self-Efficacy Scale for Healthy Meals in a Diverse Sample of Adults

Affiliations

Development and Psychometric Properties of a Self-Efficacy Scale for Healthy Meals in a Diverse Sample of Adults

Lorena Macias-Navarro et al. Res Sq. .

Abstract

Background: Many U.S. adults do not meet recommended dietary guidelines, partly due to low self-efficacy (SE) in overcoming barriers to preparing healthy meals. Existing SE measures are often lengthy, lack psychometric testing, and do not assess these barriers. To address this gap, we developed the Self-Efficacy Scale for Healthy Meals and examined its structural validity and reliability.

Methods: The SE Scale for Healthy Meals was constructed following established scale development guidelines and refined through expert reviews, reducing an initial pool of 40 items to 11. We conducted confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) using a diverse sample of 139 adults, recruited both online and from a lifestyle medicine trial. CFA models tested one-factor ("Self-Efficacy") and two factor ("Situational Barriers" and "Resource Barriers") structures using robust maximum likelihood estimation. Construct validity was assessed through model fit indices, factor loadings, and inter-item correlations, while internal consistency reliability was evaluated using Cronbach's alpha and Raykov's rho.

Results: The two-factor model demonstrated superior fit (RMSEA = 0.042; SRMR 0.052; CFI = 0.963; TLI = 0.952) compared to the one-factor solution, confirmed by a significant Satorra-Bentler scaled chi-square difference test (ΔSB c2 = 21.93, p < 0.001). Internal consistency reliability was acceptable to good (Cronbach's a and Raykov's r > 0.70).

Conclusions: The SE Scale for Healthy Meals has adequate psychometric properties, including good reliability and structural validity, when conceptualized as a two-factor measure. This tool is useful for designing and evaluating interventions to enhance cooking SE and promote healthy dietary behaviors.

Keywords: confirmatory factor analysis; cooking barriers; healthy meals; psychometric validation; scale development; self-efficacy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Visual Representation of a One Factor Model for the 11 items of the Self-Efficacy Scale for Healthy Meals
Figure 2
Figure 2
Visual Representation of a Two Factor Model for the 11 items of the Self-Efficacy Scale for Healthy Meals

Similar articles

References

    1. Anderson ES, Winett RA, Wojcik JR. Self-regulation, self-efficacy, outcome expectations, and social support: social cognitive theory and nutrition behavior. Annals Behav Medicine: Publication Soc Behav Med. 2007;34(3):304–12. 10.1007/BF02874555. [doi]. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ashton LM, Hutchesson MJ, Rollo ME, Morgan PJ, Collins CE. Motivators and Barriers to Engaging in Healthy Eating and Physical Activity. Am J Men’s Health. 2017;11(2):330–43. 10.1177/1557988316680936. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bandura A. Social foundations of thought and action. Prentice Hall; 1986.
    1. Beck AL, Iturralde E, Haya-Fisher J, Kim S, Keeton V, Fernandez A. Barriers and facilitators to healthy eating among low-income Latino adolescents. Appetite. 2019;138:215–22. 10.1016/j.appet.2019.04.004. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bross R, Genter P, Lu Y, Serpas L, Campa D, Ipp E. Barriers to Healthy Eating and Diabetes Diet Education: Divergent Perspectives of Patients and Their Providers. Health Educ Behavior: Official Publication Soc Public Health Educ. 2022;49(4):658–66. 10.1177/10901981211052241. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources