This is a preprint.
Development and Psychometric Properties of a Self-Efficacy Scale for Healthy Meals in a Diverse Sample of Adults
- PMID: 40502743
- PMCID: PMC12155232
- DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-6763050/v1
Development and Psychometric Properties of a Self-Efficacy Scale for Healthy Meals in a Diverse Sample of Adults
Abstract
Background: Many U.S. adults do not meet recommended dietary guidelines, partly due to low self-efficacy (SE) in overcoming barriers to preparing healthy meals. Existing SE measures are often lengthy, lack psychometric testing, and do not assess these barriers. To address this gap, we developed the Self-Efficacy Scale for Healthy Meals and examined its structural validity and reliability.
Methods: The SE Scale for Healthy Meals was constructed following established scale development guidelines and refined through expert reviews, reducing an initial pool of 40 items to 11. We conducted confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) using a diverse sample of 139 adults, recruited both online and from a lifestyle medicine trial. CFA models tested one-factor ("Self-Efficacy") and two factor ("Situational Barriers" and "Resource Barriers") structures using robust maximum likelihood estimation. Construct validity was assessed through model fit indices, factor loadings, and inter-item correlations, while internal consistency reliability was evaluated using Cronbach's alpha and Raykov's rho.
Results: The two-factor model demonstrated superior fit (RMSEA = 0.042; SRMR 0.052; CFI = 0.963; TLI = 0.952) compared to the one-factor solution, confirmed by a significant Satorra-Bentler scaled chi-square difference test (ΔSB c2 = 21.93, p < 0.001). Internal consistency reliability was acceptable to good (Cronbach's a and Raykov's r > 0.70).
Conclusions: The SE Scale for Healthy Meals has adequate psychometric properties, including good reliability and structural validity, when conceptualized as a two-factor measure. This tool is useful for designing and evaluating interventions to enhance cooking SE and promote healthy dietary behaviors.
Keywords: confirmatory factor analysis; cooking barriers; healthy meals; psychometric validation; scale development; self-efficacy.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Development and Validation of the Psychometric Properties of the FitMIND Foundation Sweets Addiction Scale-A Pilot Study.Nutrients. 2025 Jun 12;17(12):1985. doi: 10.3390/nu17121985. Nutrients. 2025. PMID: 40573095 Free PMC article.
-
Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the pros and cons of anorexia nervosa (P-CAN-C) scale: a validation study in patients with anorexia nervosa.J Eat Disord. 2025 Jun 16;13(1):111. doi: 10.1186/s40337-025-01314-x. J Eat Disord. 2025. PMID: 40524259 Free PMC article.
-
Validation of the Chinese Patient Participation Scale (PPS-C) in Internal Medicine Patient: A Psychometric Study.Patient Prefer Adherence. 2025 Jun 10;19:1703-1715. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S518317. eCollection 2025. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2025. PMID: 40529800 Free PMC article.
-
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 35593186 Free PMC article.
-
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 22;12(12):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jan 9;1:CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub3. PMID: 29271481 Free PMC article. Updated.
References
-
- Bandura A. Social foundations of thought and action. Prentice Hall; 1986.
Publication types
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous