Use of clinical care classification terminology in the nursing field: A scoping review
- PMID: 40502802
- PMCID: PMC12152869
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2025.100340
Use of clinical care classification terminology in the nursing field: A scoping review
Abstract
Background: Clinical Care Classification terminology, a category of standardized nursing terminologies, has a clear hierarchical structure, well-defined processes, and a scientifically grounded coding system. In the era of information technology, reviewing the progress of Clinical Care Classification terminology in the field of nursing is crucial for the future selection and standardization of nursing terminology.
Objective: This review aims to examine the application and impact of Clinical Care Classification terminology in the nursing field.
Methods: This study was reported by the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses extension for scoping reviews checklist.
Results: We searched six databases and ultimately included 60 studies in our review. We assessed the use of Clinical Care Classification terminology across eight aspects: nursing practice, nursing management, nursing education, nursing research, electronic health records documentation, terminology mapping, cross-cultural translation, and systematic integration.
Conclusions: The value of Clinical Care Classification terminology in the nursing field has been demonstrated. However, due to the specialties of different departments, timely updates and additions to the coding are necessary. Meanwhile, it is important to emphasize the significance of nursing students and nurses learning the theory of terminology and its coding. The cross-cultural translation of Clinical Care Classification terminology and its mapping to other terminologies also play a crucial role in the continuity and comparability of nursing care.
Registration: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/637SW.
Keywords: Clinical care classification; Nursing care; Nursing terminology; Scoping review; Standardized nursing terminology.
© 2025 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the Clinical Care Classification system.Int J Med Inform. 2021 Sep;153:104534. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2021.104534. Epub 2021 Jul 16. Int J Med Inform. 2021. PMID: 34332469
-
Use of standardized terminologies in clinical practice: A scoping review.Int J Med Inform. 2021 May;149:104431. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2021.104431. Epub 2021 Feb 25. Int J Med Inform. 2021. PMID: 33713915
-
Digital Teaching and Learning Media for Nursing and Health Care Courses in Germany: Protocol for a Scoping Review.JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Jan 17;14:e60427. doi: 10.2196/60427. JMIR Res Protoc. 2025. PMID: 39823593 Free PMC article.
-
Formal nursing focused academic practice partnerships for advancing nursing research and scholarship: a scoping review protocol.Int J Nurs Educ Scholarsh. 2024 Jun 7;21(1). doi: 10.1515/ijnes-2023-0058. eCollection 2024 Jan 1. Int J Nurs Educ Scholarsh. 2024. PMID: 38842139
-
Simulation-based learning in palliative care in postgraduate nursing education: a scoping review.BMC Palliat Care. 2023 Mar 29;22(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s12904-023-01149-w. BMC Palliat Care. 2023. PMID: 36991463 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Background. Clinical care Classification System n.d. https://clinicalcareclassification.org/about/background/(accessed February 4, 2025).
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources