Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 May 28:13:1547189.
doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1547189. eCollection 2025.

Technology access, use, socioeconomic status, and healthcare disparities among African Americans in the US

Affiliations

Technology access, use, socioeconomic status, and healthcare disparities among African Americans in the US

Ebenezer Larnyo et al. Front Public Health. .

Abstract

Background: Healthcare disparities remain a significant challenge in addressing equitable healthcare access and outcomes for minority populations, including African Americans. Rooted in systemic racism and historical exclusion, these inequities persist as part of broader structural violence. Leveraging health technology holds promise in addressing these disparities by enhancing access to care, improving its quality, and reducing inequities. However, the association between health technology access, use, socioeconomic status (SES), and healthcare disparities among African Americans remains underexplored. This study aims to explore the potential role of technology in mitigating healthcare disparities by investigating the associations between technology access, healthcare technology use, socioeconomic status (SES), and health disparities among African Americans.

Methods: Using data from the Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS) Wave 6 dataset, a sample of 815 African Americans was analyzed using Partial Least Squares-Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM).

Findings: The results of the study showed that technology access had a significant positive effect on healthcare technology use (β = 0.260, p < 0.000). Technology access (β = -0.086, p = 0.034) and healthcare technology use (β = -0.180, p < 0.001) demonstrated a significant negative effect on healthcare disparity, respectively. Results also revealed SES had a significant positive effect on technology access (β = 0.424, p < 0.001). Additionally, SES was found to significantly moderate the relationship between technology access and healthcare disparities, indicating variability in the impact of technology access based on SES levels among African Americans.

Conclusion: These findings highlight the potential of technology in mitigating healthcare disparities among African Americans. By promoting enhanced health technology access and utilization, particularly in lower SES populations, the healthcare outcomes for vulnerable communities can be significantly improved. Policymakers, healthcare providers, and technology developers are encouraged to collaborate in providing conducive conditions for the adoption and use of technology to advance healthcare equity.

Keywords: African American; healthcare disparity/health disparities; healthcare technology use; socioeconomic status; technology access; technology inequity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Path diagram showing loadings and composite reliability of the various latent and observed variables.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Path diagram showing bootstrapped results.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Result of the simple slope analysis of the moderating effect of SES on TECH_ACC → H_DISPARITY.

Similar articles

References

    1. Brewer LC, Fortuna KL, Jones C, Walker R, Hayes SN, Patten CA, et al. Back to the future: achieving health equity through health informatics and digital health. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. (2020) 8:e14512. doi: 10.2196/14512, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Koonin LM, Hoots B, Tsang CA, Leroy Z, Farris K, Jolly B, et al. Trends in the use of telehealth during the emergence of the COVID-19 pandemic - United States, January-March 2020. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. (2020) 69:1595–9. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6943a3, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Massey DS, Denton NA. American apartheid: segregation and the making of the underclass In: Social stratification, class, race, and gender in sociological perspective. 2nd ed. Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxfordshire, United Kingdom: Routledge; (2019). 660–70.
    1. Bonilla-Silva E. Rethinking racism: toward a structural interpretation. Am Sociol Rev. (1997) 62:465–80. doi: 10.2307/2657316 - DOI
    1. Braveman PA, Arkin E, Proctor D, Kauh T, Holm N. Systemic and structural racism: definitions, examples, health damages, and approaches to dismantling. Health Aff. (2022) 41:171–8. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2021.01394, PMID: - DOI - PubMed