Decellularized scaffolds and heart valve treatment: present techniques, long-standing hurdles and the challenging future
- PMID: 40505382
- DOI: 10.1016/j.bioadv.2025.214367
Decellularized scaffolds and heart valve treatment: present techniques, long-standing hurdles and the challenging future
Abstract
Decellularized scaffolds represent a promising frontier in heart valve therapy, offering potential advantages over traditional mechanical and bioprosthetic alternatives. However, significant challenges persist in their clinical implementation. We try to review the critical factors affecting decellularized valve performance, focusing on the interplay between physical, chemical, and enzymatic decellularization methods and their impact on extracellular matrix (ECM) integrity. Our comprehensive analysis reveals that while these scaffolds can support cellular repopulation and demonstrate growth potential- particularly beneficial for pediatric applications- they face substantial limitations including thrombogenicity, calcification, immunogenicity, and leaflet retraction. The balance between effective cellular removal and ECM preservation emerges as a central challenge, with evidence suggesting that optimization of decellularization protocols may mitigate calcification risks. The development of standardized processing parameters across various tissue sources remains challenging, as source-dependent variations significantly influence functional outcomes. Xenogeneic tissues, while more readily available, demonstrate heightened immunogenicity and thrombogenic potential compared to allogeneic alternatives. Recent advancements in antigen removal techniques, particularly targeting the α-Gal epitope, show promise in reducing xenogeneic scaffold immunogenicity. Novel approaches incorporating surface modifications and crosslinking agents demonstrate significant potential in enhancing scaffold durability and cellular integration. Recellularization strategies, including pre-implantation endothelialization and the use of mesenchymal stem cells, may further improve scaffold functionality and reduce thrombogenic risk. Here, we examine advanced methodological developments in the field of heart valve decellularization, while identifying critical technical barriers that currently limit broad clinical translation. The ongoing refinement of decellularization technologies represents significant progress toward a fundamental objective in cardiovascular medicine: creating functional valve replacements with capacity for growth, regeneration, and hemodynamic adaptation throughout the patient's lifespan.
Keywords: Calcification; Decellularization; ECM preservation; Heart valve scaffolds; Thrombogenicity; Tissue engineering.
Copyright © 2025 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Similar articles
-
Comparative Analysis of Hydrogels From Porcine Extracellular Matrix for 3D Bioprinting of Adipose Tissue.J Biomed Mater Res A. 2025 Apr;113(4):e37832. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.37832. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2025. PMID: 40165526
-
Engineering of bioprosthetic heart valves with synergistic zwitterionic surface modification and zirconium cross-linking for improved biocompatibility and durability.Acta Biomater. 2025 Jul 1;201:266-282. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2025.06.010. Epub 2025 Jun 7. Acta Biomater. 2025. PMID: 40490240
-
Advancements and Perspectives in the Bioprosthetic Heart Valve: A Comprehensive Review on Biomaterial Processing and Emerging Polymeric Materials.J Am Heart Assoc. 2025 Aug 19;14(16):e043061. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.125.043061. Epub 2025 Aug 6. J Am Heart Assoc. 2025. PMID: 40767293 Review.
-
Decellularized lucky bamboo scaffolds for cartilage tissue engineering.Biomed Mater. 2025 Jul 11;20(4). doi: 10.1088/1748-605X/adebd2. Biomed Mater. 2025. PMID: 40609599
-
Engineering Vascularized Composite Allografts Using Natural Scaffolds: A Systematic Review.Tissue Eng Part B Rev. 2022 Jun;28(3):677-693. doi: 10.1089/ten.TEB.2021.0102. Epub 2021 Oct 22. Tissue Eng Part B Rev. 2022. PMID: 34238047
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources