Describing phenotypes in FSHD: an update of the comprehensive clinical evaluation form
- PMID: 40506648
- DOI: 10.1007/s10072-025-08276-7
Describing phenotypes in FSHD: an update of the comprehensive clinical evaluation form
Abstract
Background: Facioscapolohumeral muscular dystrophy is characterized by a wide clinical variability; the underlying reasons and the relation between them and the genetic markers are still not clear. In fact, the different phenotypes could show a different disease progression and/or imply distinct genetic mechanisms. As clinical trials are approaching also for FSHD, the correct description and stratification of patients becomes mandatory. To address these matters, in 2016 the Italian Clinical Group for FSHD developed the Comprehensive Clinical Evaluation Form (CCEF), aimed at describing the different observed phenotypes in FSHD.
Methods: A working group composed by the former developers of the CCEF and other expert clinicians re-evaluated the whole structure of the CCEF, to develop a simplified version for use in clinical practice; also, other expert clinicians not referring to the Italian Clinical Group for FSHD read and approved the CCEF revised version for its international use.
Results: We present the CCEF-R, a revised and simplified version of the CCEF, that while maintaining all the core structure and items of the previous validated version, has been modified with new friendlier graphics, focused on the key anamnestic and neurological examination findings, to facilitate its understanding and use in clinical practice.
Conclusions: The phenotypical classification combined with the genetic signature should be considered during the diagnostic work out for guiding genetic analysis and for genotype-phenotype correlations and genetic counseling. The CCEF could have a significant role in the clinical stratification process of patients for clinical trials and in laying the groundwork for evidence-based medical decision making.
Keywords: CCEF; Clinical categories; Clinical variability; FSHD; Genotype–phenotype correlation.
© 2025. Fondazione Società Italiana di Neurologia.
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Ethical approval and informed consent: No ethical committee approval was required given the nature of the manuscript. Competing interests: The authors have no competing interests to disclose.
References
-
- Mul K, Lassche S, Voermans NC, Padberg GW, Horlings CG, van Engelen BG (2016) What’s in a name? The clinical features of facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy. Pract Neurol 16(3):201–207. https://doi.org/10.1136/practneurol-2015-001353 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Lutz KL, Holte L, Kliethermes SA, Stephan C, Mathews KD (2013) Clinical and genetic features of hearing loss in facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy. Neurology 81(16):1374–7. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182a84140 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Statland JM, Sacconi S, Farmakidis C, Donlin-Smith CM, Chung M, Tawil R (2013) Coats syndrome in facioscapulohumeral dystrophy type 1: frequency and D4Z4 contraction size. Neurology 80(13):1247–50. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182897116 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Grosso S, Mostardini R, Di Bartolo RM, Balestri P, Verrotti A (2011) Epilepsy, speech delay, and mental retardation in facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy. Eur J Paediatr Neurol 15(5):456–460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpn.2011.04.003 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Moreira S, Wood L, Smith D, Marini-Bettolo C, Guglieri M, McMacken G, Bailey G, Mayhew A, Muni-Lofra R, Eglon G, Williams M, Straub V, Lochmüller H, Evangelista T (2017) Respiratory involvement in ambulant and non-ambulant patients with facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy. J Neurol. 264(6):1271–1280. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-017-8525-9 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials