Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jun 12;25(1):73.
doi: 10.1186/s40644-025-00886-w.

Image analysis: 68Ga-FAPI-46 PET derived texture parameters improve the differentiation of malignant and benign pulmonary lesions

Affiliations

Image analysis: 68Ga-FAPI-46 PET derived texture parameters improve the differentiation of malignant and benign pulmonary lesions

Joel Wessendorf et al. Cancer Imaging. .

Abstract

Background: Pulmonary lesions inconclusive in 18F-FDG PET/CT are a known clinical problem. Both texture analysis and 68Ga-FAPI-46 have shown potential in thoracic oncological problems but their combination has not been assessed yet. This initial analysis aims to evaluate the utility of 68Ga-FAPI-46 PET texture parameters to differentiate between lung cancer and benign pulmonary lesions inconclusive in 18F-FDG PET/CT.

Materials and methods: 20 histologically confirmed pulmonary lesions (13 lung cancer, 7 benign) in 19 patients were evaluated. All patients underwent an inconclusive 18F-FDG PET/CT before 68Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT. 64 texture parameters and conventional parameters (SUVs, TBRs) were analyzed. Texture parameters with significant (P < 0.05) differences between lung cancer and benign lesions were detected by the Mann-Whitney U test. Boxplots and a scatter plot matrix were created. Principal component analyses and Spearman correlations were performed. Receiver operating characteristics curves with area under the curve (AUC) values were created for univariable and bivariable logistic regression.

Results: The texture parameters HIST Maximum grey level (AUC = 0.901), HIST Mean (AUC = 0.802), HIST Mode (AUC = 0.835), HIST Range (AUC = 0.901) and GLCM Information correlation 1 (AUC = 0.824) showed significant differences between lung cancer and benign pulmonary lesions. AUC values of conventional parameters (SUVmax, SUVmean, TBR(SUVmax), TBR(SUVmean)) were 0.791, 0.868, 0.802 and 0.857, respectively. Maximum AUC values of bivariable logistic regression were 0.967 and 0.978 for two texture parameters and the combination of conventional and texture parameters, respectively. Correlations between texture parameter pairs were mainly moderate (0.4≤ρ≤0.59). 2/5 texture parameters (HIST Mean, HIST Mode) displayed no very strong correlations (0.8≤ρ≤1.00) to any conventional parameters or lesion volume.

Conclusion: 68Ga-FAPI-46 PET texture parameters show great potential to differentiate between lung cancer and benign pulmonary lesions inconclusive in 18F-FDG/PET. Spearman correlations indicate additional information value of texture parameters.

Keywords: Image analysis; Lung cancer; Pulmonary lesion; Texture analysis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: All procedures performed in studies involving human participants confirmed to the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and to the Helsinki declaration (1964) and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This retrospective study was approved by the local advisory ethic committee (study number S-115/2020). Consent for publication: All patients have given written consent to publication. Competing interests: U.H. has filed a patent application for quinoline-based FAP-targeting agents for imaging and therapy in nuclear medicine. U.H. also has shares of a consultancy group for iTheranostics.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Methodic overview
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Boxplots of conventional (A) and texture parameters (B). Boxes represent the interquartile range with the horizontal line inside each box indicating the median. Whiskers extend to 1.5 time the interquartile range. Individual data points are shown as dots. Statistical significance is marked with stars (*=p < 0.05, **=p < 0.01)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Scatter plot matrix of texture parameters with Spearman correlations and histograms. Spearman correlation coefficients between two different texture parameters are given in the upper right section of the diagram for all data, only lung cancer data and only data of benign lesions, respectively. Statistical significance of correlation is marked with stars (* = p < 0.05, ** = p < 0.01, *** = p < 0.001). Scatter plots in the lower left section visually show distribution of texture parameter values. The diagonal displays the histograms of individual texture parameters. Red dots and boxes represent lung cancer data while green dots and boxes represent data of benign lesions
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Spearman matrix displaying correlation coefficients for the relationships between texture parameters and conventional parameters
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Principal component analysis of all texture parameters (A) and only the statistically significant texture parameters (B)
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
ROC curves with AUC values of univariable logistic regression of conventional parameters (A) and texture parameters (B)
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
ROC curves with AUC values of bivariable logistic regression of statistically significant texture parameter pairs (A) and combinations of conventional parameters with statistically significant texture parameters (B)

References

    1. Bray F, Laversanne M, Sung H, et al. Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2024;74:229–63. 10.3322/caac.21834 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dabrowska M, Krenke R, Korczynski P, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced computed tomography and positron emission tomography with 18-FDG in identifying malignant solitary pulmonary nodules. Med (Baltim). 2015;94:e666. 10.1097/MD.0000000000000666 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chang JM, Lee HJ, Goo JM, et al. False positive and false negative FDG-PET scans in various thoracic diseases. Korean J Radiol. 2006;7:57–69. 10.3348/kjr.2006.7.1.57 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kostakoglu L, Agress H, Goldsmith SJ. Clinical role of FDG PET in evaluation of cancer patients. Radiographics. 2003;23:315–40. 10.1148/rg.232025705. quiz 533. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ruilong Z, Daohai X, Li G, et al. Diagnostic value of 18F-FDG-PET/CT for the evaluation of solitary pulmonary nodules: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Nucl Med Commun. 2017;38:67–75. 10.1097/MNM.0000000000000605 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources