Lenvatinib Is Highly Effective in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma Related to Both Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatohepatitis and Alcoholic Etiology: A Propensity Score Analysis
- PMID: 40507289
- PMCID: PMC12153599
- DOI: 10.3390/cancers17111808
Lenvatinib Is Highly Effective in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma Related to Both Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatohepatitis and Alcoholic Etiology: A Propensity Score Analysis
Abstract
Background and aims: Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD)-related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) may have distinct biological characteristics influencing systemic treatment response. However, the prognostic impact of MASLD vs. alcohol-related HCC in patients receiving lenvatinib remains unclear. This study aimed to assess lenvatinib's effectiveness and safety in these populations. Methods: A multicenter cohort of 378 HCC patients treated with lenvatinib (2019-2024) was analyzed. Propensity score matching was performed based on age, sex, tumoral stage, alpha-fetoprotein levels and Child-Pugh class. Survival was estimated using Kaplan-Meier analysis and compared with the log-rank test. Results were expressed as HR and 95% CI. Results: After matching, 115 patients per group were compared. Median OS was 21 months (95% CI: 20-23) in the group with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH) and 19 months (95% CI: 18-21) in the group with alcohol etiology (p = 0.18). In multivariate analysis, only Child-Pugh class (HR 2.67, 95% CI: 1.84-5.41) and tumor stage (HR 2.18, 95% CI: 1.57-6.93) resulted as significant predictors of OS. Median PFS was 9 months (95% CI: 8-9) in patients with MASH and 9 months (95% CI: 7-10) in patients with alcohol etiology (p = 0.33). Only the Child-Pugh class was a significant predictor of PFS in univariate analysis (HR 1.56, 95% CI: 1.15-3.41; p = 0.03). No difference in terms of adverse event rate was observed between the two groups. Conclusions: Lenvatinib is effective in patients with both MASH- and alcohol-related HCC, with no difference in oncological outcomes between the two groups.
Keywords: HCC; liver cancer; progression; propensity matching; survival.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
Figures
References
-
- El-Serag H.B. Hepatocellular carcinoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 2011;365:1118–1127. - PubMed
-
- Heimbach J.K., Kulik L.M., Finn R.S., Sirlin C.B., Abecassis M.M., Roberts L.R., Zhu A.X., Murad M.H., Marrero J.A. AASLD guidelines for the treatment of hepato-cellular carcinoma. Hepatology. 2018;67:358–380. - PubMed
-
- Llovet J.M., Ricci S., Mazzaferro V., Hilgard P., Gane E., Blanc J.F., de Oliveira A.C., Santoro A., Raoul J.-L., Forner A., et al. Sorafenib in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 2008;359:378–390. - PubMed
-
- Ponziani F.R., Bhoori S., Germini A., Bongini M., Flores M., Sposito C., Facciorusso A., Gasbarrini A., Mazzaferro V. Inducing tolerability of adverse events increases sorafenib exposure and optimizes patient’s outcome in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Liver Int. 2015;36:1033–1042. doi: 10.1111/liv.13052. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Kudo M., Finn R.S., Qin S., Han K.-H., Ikeda K., Piscaglia F., Baron A., Park J.-W., Han G., Jassem J., et al. Lenvatinib versus sorafenib in first-line treatment of patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A randomised phase 3 non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2018;391:1163–1173. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30207-1. - DOI - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
