Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 May 29;17(11):1815.
doi: 10.3390/cancers17111815.

Radiation Dose Reduction in Cancer Imaging with New-Model CT Scanners: A Quality of Care Evaluation

Affiliations

Radiation Dose Reduction in Cancer Imaging with New-Model CT Scanners: A Quality of Care Evaluation

Stefania Rizzo et al. Cancers (Basel). .

Abstract

Background/objectives: The primary aim of this study was to evaluate whether the replacement of roughly one-decade-old computed tomography (CT) scanners with new-model CT scanners were associated with an additional reduction in the radiation dose delivered to oncological patients, in a radiological setting where the optimization of protocols had already reached very low radiation doses. An exploratory secondary objective was to evaluate the potential differences in the objective image quality between the CT scans obtained before and after the installation of the new-generation CT scanners.

Methods: Chest and abdominal CT examinations conducted for oncologic purposes were retrospectively selected from two time periods-prior to scanner replacement (2022) and following an upgrade (2024)-after five CT systems in our radiology department were replaced. We extracted and compared the CT dose index (CTDI) and dose length product (DLP) for each CT phase. For the objective image quality evaluation, we calculated the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) at the center of the liver and the aorta. An appropriate statistical analysis was performed and a p-value < 0.05 was considered significant.

Results: We included 14,601 CT acquisitions, of which 9013 (61.7%) were performed before and 5588 (38.3%) after the replacement of the CT scanners. There were significantly lower values for the CTDI and DLP with the new CT scanners compared to the old ones. The CTDI with the new CT scanners was significantly lower in all phases (p-value = 0.002 for unenhanced phase, and p < 0.001 for arterial, portal venous, and delayed phases). The DLP using the new CT scanners was significantly lower in the arterial, portal venous, and delayed phases (p < 0.001), and it was not significantly different in the unenhanced phase (p = 0.36). There was no significant difference in the SNR at the liver level (p = 0.72) or at the aorta level (p = 0.51). There was no significant difference in the CNR at the liver level (p = 0.24), whereas the CNR was higher with the new CT scanners at the aorta level (p = 0.03).

Conclusions: The transition to new-model CT scanners resulted in a significant reduction in the radiation dose delivered by chest and abdomen CT scans, without compromising the objective image quality.

Keywords: computed tomography; computed tomography dose index; dose length product; objective image quality; radiation dose; replacement.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Differences in CTDI (A) and DLP (B) for all CT phases from the old and new CT scanners.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Differences in CTDI for each phase of acquisition with old and new CT scanners.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Differences in DLP for each phase of acquisition with old and new CT scanners.

Similar articles

References

    1. Lee T.-Y., Chhem R.K. Impact of new technologies on dose reduction in CT. Eur. J. Radiol. 2010;76:28–35. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.06.036. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mahesh M., Ansari A.J., Mettler F.A. Patient Exposure from Radiologic and Nuclear Medicine Procedures in the United States and Worldwide: 2009–2018. Radiology. 2023;307:e221263. doi: 10.1148/radiol.221263. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Milano M.T., Mahesh M., Mettler F.A., Elee J., Vetter R.J. Patient Radiation Exposure: Imaging During Radiation Oncology Procedures: Executive Summary of NCRP Report No. 184. J. Am. Coll. Radiol. 2020;17:1176–1182. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2020.02.002. - DOI - PubMed
    1. McCollough C.H. Computed Tomography Technology-and Dose-in the 21st Century. Health Phys. 2019;116:157–162. doi: 10.1097/HP.0000000000000997. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Karamat M.I. Strategies and Scientific Basis of Dose Reduction on State-of-the-Art Multirow Detector X-Ray CT Systems. Crit. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 2015;43:33–59. doi: 10.1615/CritRevBiomedEng.2015013977. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources