Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Jun 3;18(11):2612.
doi: 10.3390/ma18112612.

Impact of Structural Stiffness on Vibration Periods of Concrete Buildings: A Systematic Review

Juan Paredes  1   2 , Wladimir Ramirez  1   3 , Fernanda Pico  1   3 , Rodrigo Acosta  1   3 , Oscar G Toapanta  4 , Margarita Mayacela  1   3
Affiliations
Review

Impact of Structural Stiffness on Vibration Periods of Concrete Buildings: A Systematic Review

Juan Paredes et al. Materials (Basel). .

Abstract

Research on the relationship between structural characteristics and vibration periods in concrete buildings is crucial to ensure the safety and efficiency of these structures, especially in earthquake-prone areas. This article aims to analyze and compare the impact of structural stiffness of different elements, such as beams, columns and shear walls, on vibration periods, through a systematic review of existing models and formulas in the literature, identifying their applications and limitations. The methodology used consists of a systematic review that integrates recent and relevant studies, providing a solid basis for analysis. The results indicate that an increase in the stiffness of structural elements can reduce vibration periods by 20-50%, implying a faster response to external forces. Even in low-rise buildings, the fundamental period can be reduced by 53% to 70%. These findings are significant for the design and construction of concrete buildings, as they suggest that incorporating rigid structural elements can improve seismic resistance and reduce the risk of damage. In addition, the research contributes to the field of structural dynamics by highlighting the need to integrate different methods of analysis and evaluation. It is recommended that engineers and architects adopt innovative approaches, such as the use of emerging technologies and monitoring methods, to improve damage detection and optimize structural design. Finally, it identifies areas where more research is required, suggesting that future studies should explore the interaction between structural characteristics and environmental conditions for a more complete understanding of the vibrational behavior of buildings.

Keywords: concrete buildings; dynamic response; stiffness; structural models; vibration periods.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Median maximum story drifts over IDA results (4- and 8-story buildings) [15].
Figure 2
Figure 2
Flow diagram of the adapted PRISMA approach used in this study.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Relationship between height and vibration period of Concrete Buildings.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Relationship between vibration period and types of concrete buildings.
Figure 5
Figure 5
3D diagram of shear wall positions for seismic reinforcement of structures. (a) middle external position, (b) central internal position, (c) lateral external position at two corners, (d) external position at all four corners, (e) lateral external position at four corners and (f) central lateral position.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Comparison of cumulative distribution functions in structural stiffness [14].
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Jamadin A., Kudus S.A., Ya’akob A.D.H., Misnan M.F., Jaini Z.M. Vibration-Based Finite Element Model Analysis on Dynamic Characteristics of Ultra-High Performance Concrete Beam. Int. J. Integr. Eng. 2023;15:213–223. doi: 10.30880/ijie.2023.15.07.020. - DOI
    1. Alrudaini T. Estimating vibration period of reinforced concrete moment resisting frame buildings. Res. Eng. Struct. Mater. 2023;9:1417–1432. doi: 10.17515/resm2023.724st0331. - DOI
    1. Regni M., Arezzo D., Carbonari S., Gara F., Zonta D. Effect of Environmental Conditions on the Modal Response of a 10-Story Reinforced Concrete Tower. Shock Vib. 2018;2018:9476146. doi: 10.1155/2018/9476146. - DOI
    1. Yanik Y., Aymelek A., Yildirim Ö., Demirtaş B., Türker T. Variations of natural frequencies of masonry minarets due to environmental effects. J. Civ. Struct. Health Monit. 2024;14:635–661. doi: 10.1007/s13349-023-00745-x. - DOI
    1. Sharhan Z.S., Cucuzza R., Domaneschi M., Ghodousian O., Rad M.M. Reinforcement of RC Two-Way Slabs with CFRP Laminates: Plastic Limit Method for Carbon Emissions and Deformation Control. Buildings. 2024;14:3873. doi: 10.3390/buildings14123873. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources