Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 May 29:16:1570812.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1570812. eCollection 2025.

Bystander interventions against gender-based violence and harassment in the workplace: a scoping review

Affiliations

Bystander interventions against gender-based violence and harassment in the workplace: a scoping review

Kristan Stampe Nielsen et al. Front Psychol. .

Abstract

Gender-based violence and harassment (GBVH) has detrimental effects on organisational performance and employee well-being. Primary-level bystander intervention programmes that enable employees to act when witnessing GBVH offer a promising prevention strategy. Despite the increased focus on the importance of primary-level bystander interventions, limited efforts have been made to systematically synthesise research in this area. The present scoping review therefore sought to consolidate research on primary-level bystander interventions implemented in organisations by exploring the theoretical frameworks used to develop these interventions, determining outcomes, and examining facilitators and obstacles for their implementation. Five databases [Embase (Ovid), MEDLINE (Ovid), Scopus, Web of Science, and PsycINFO (Ovid)], and grey literature were systematically searched. Out of 11.302 references screened, 14 studies were included in the present scoping review. Findings suggest that primary-level bystander interventions, particularly bystander training workshops incorporating practice exercises, can increase prosocial bystander behaviour. However, the paucity of follow-up measurements makes it challenging to evaluate their long-term efficacy. The included studies underscore the importance of tailoring interventions to specific workplace contexts. While comprehensive program theories underpin most studies, organisational change theories were typically absent, even when interventions aimed to achieve cultural change. In conclusion, this review emphasises the significance of bystander interventions for primary GBVH prevention and underscores the need for further research to identify optimal practices and ensure enduring effectiveness.

Systematic review registration: The protocol is registered on the Open Science Framework website at https://osf.io/3pt5k/.

Keywords: bystander intervention; gender-based violence and harassment; primary prevention; sexual harassment; workplace harassment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart of the screening process.

Similar articles

References

    1. Banyard V. (2008). Measurement and correlates of prosocial bystander behavior: the case of interpersonal violence. Violence Vict. 23, 83–97. doi: 10.1891/0886-6708.23.1.83 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Banyard V., Moynihan M. M., Crossman M. T. (2009). Reducing sexual violence on campus: the role of student leaders as empowered bystanders. J. Coll. Stud. Dev. 50, 446–457. doi: 10.1353/csd.0.0083 - DOI
    1. Banyard V., Plante E. G., Moynihan M. M. (2004). Bystander education: bringing a broader community perspective to sexual violence prevention. J. Community Psychol. 32, 61–79. doi: 10.1002/jcop.10078 - DOI
    1. Banyard V., Waterman E., Edwards K. (2021). Bystanders to prevent peer sexual violence: understanding patterns of prosocial behavior over time from early to later adolescence. J. Youth Adolesc. 50, 1982–1994. doi: 10.1007/s10964-021-01479-z - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bartholomew L. K., Mullen P. D. (2011). Five roles for using theory and evidence in the design and testing of behavior change interventions: theory in behavior change intervention. J. Public Health Dent. 71, S20–S33. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-7325.2011.00223.x, PMID: - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources