Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 May;17(Suppl 1):S442-S444.
doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_1450_24. Epub 2025 Feb 25.

Safety and Efficacy of Different Sedation Protocols in Managing Dental Anxiety in Adult Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Affiliations

Safety and Efficacy of Different Sedation Protocols in Managing Dental Anxiety in Adult Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial

G L Georgeno et al. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2025 May.

Abstract

Introduction: Dental anxiety is a significant barrier to effective dental treatment, often resulting in delayed care. Various sedation protocols are utilized to manage this anxiety, but comparative data on their safety and efficacy are limited.

Methods: This randomized controlled trial compared the safety and efficacy of oral midazolam, nitrous oxide, and intravenous (IV) sedation in managing dental anxiety in adult patients. Key parameters included anxiety reduction using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), time to onset of sedation, patient satisfaction, and adverse effects.

Results: Patients receiving IV sedation showed the fastest onset and highest anxiety reduction, but oral midazolam exhibited fewer side effects. Patient satisfaction was highest with IV sedation.

Conclusion: IV sedation was found to be the most effective in reducing anxiety, while oral midazolam offered better safety. Future studies should further explore patient-specific protocols.

Keywords: Dental anxiety; IV sedation; midazolam; nitrous oxide; patient satisfaction.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

There are no conflicts of interest.

Similar articles

References

    1. Araújo JO, Bergamaschi CC, Lopes LC, Guimarães CC, de Andrade NK, Ramacciato JC, et al. Effectiveness and safety of oral sedation in adult patients undergoing dental procedures: A systematic review. BMJ Open. 2021;11:e043363. - PMC - PubMed
    1. da Cunha RS, Amorim KS, Gercina AC, de Oliveira ACA, Dos Santos Menezes L, Groppo FC, et al. Herbal medicines as anxiolytics prior to third molar surgical extraction. Clin Oral Investig. 2021;25:1579–86. - PubMed
    1. Stamp AJ, Rolland SL, Wilson KE, Vernazza CR. Conscious sedation in children:the need to strengthen the evidence base remains. Evid Based Dent. 2019;20:62–3. - PubMed
    1. Cruickshank M, Henderson L, MacLennan G, Fraser C, Campbell M, Blackwood B, et al. Alpha-2 agonists for sedation of mechanically ventilated adults in intensive care units: A systematic review. Health Technol Assess. 2016;20:1–117. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dionne RA, Yagiela JA, Moore PA, Gonty A, Zuniga J, Beirne OR. Comparing efficacy and safety of four intravenous sedation regimens in dental outpatients. J Am Dent Assoc. 2001;132:740–51. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources