Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Dec;19(4):443-470.
doi: 10.1177/1476718X211020031. Epub 2021 Jun 14.

Measuring early child development across low and middle-income countries: A systematic review

Affiliations

Measuring early child development across low and middle-income countries: A systematic review

Bernardita Munoz-Chereau et al. J Early Child Res. 2021 Dec.

Abstract

The Sustainable Development Goals mandate that by 2030, all children should have access to quality early child development opportunities, healthcare and pre-primary education. Yet validated measures of ECD in low and middle income countries (LMICs) are rare. To address this gap, a Systematic Review (SR) of measures available to profile the development of children between the ages of 0-5 years in LMICs was undertaken. Drawing on education, psychology and health databases, we identified reliable, valid or measures adapted for use in LMICs for either assessments of children's development or their learning environments. The inclusion criteria were (1) peer reviewed papers published between January 2009 and May 2019; (2) assessment tools used to measure cognitive/language development or the early years or home environment in at least one LMIC; (3) report of the psychometric properties (validity and reliability) of the tool, and/or description of the cultural adaptability/translation process undertaken before applying it to a LMIC. Two hundred and forty-nine available records published in the last decade in peer-review journals and nine relevant systematic literature reviews were identified. Fifty-seven records were qualitatively synthesised based on their psychometric properties and cultural adaptation. Forty-three tools were reviewed utilising 12 criteria. Five elements of analysis present in Tables 2 and 3 (study, population tested, validity, reliability and cultural adaptability/translation) focused on the tools' psychometric properties and previous application in LMICs. A further seven dimensions outlined in Tables 4 and 5 identified specific characteristics of the tools from target age, administration method, domains, battery, accessibility, language and country/institution. We suggest these 12 key considerations for the selection of measurement tools that are applicable to effectively assess ECD in LMICs.

Keywords: ECE setting; LMIC; child stunting; cognitive development; early childhood development; home environment; systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines flowchart for article selection (Moher et al., 2015).

Similar articles

References

    1. Aboud FE, Yousafzai AK. (2015) Global health and development in early childhood. Annual Review of Psychology 66: 433–457. - PubMed
    1. Barnett-Page E, Thomas J. (2009) Methods for the synthesis of qualitative research: A critical review. BMC Medical Research Methodology 9(1): 1–11. - PMC - PubMed
    1. *Bernal R, Attanasio O, Pena X, et al. (2019) The effects of the transition from home-based childcare to childcare centers on children’s health and development in Colombia. Early Childhood Research Quarterly 47: 418–431. - PMC - PubMed
    1. *Bhopal S, Roy R, Verma D, et al. (2019) Impact of adversity on early childhood growth and development in rural India: Findings from the early life stress sub-study of the SPRING cluster randomised controlled trial (SPRING-ELS). PLoS One 14(1): e0209122. - PMC - PubMed
    1. *Biersteker L, Dawes A, Hendricks L, et al. (2016) Center-based early childhood care and education program quality: a South African study. Early Childhood Research Quarterly 36: 334–344.

LinkOut - more resources