Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 May 26:42:102063.
doi: 10.1016/j.bbrep.2025.102063. eCollection 2025 Jun.

Spinal cord injury models: Advantages and disadvantages in the view of pathophysiology and clinical significance

Affiliations
Review

Spinal cord injury models: Advantages and disadvantages in the view of pathophysiology and clinical significance

Min-Qi Li et al. Biochem Biophys Rep. .

Abstract

Over recent decades, SCI research has advanced in understanding its pathophysiology and related mechanisms. Researchers developed many rodent SCI models to mimic injury processes, which are crucial for evaluating therapies and understanding pathology. But choosing the right model for specific research is challenging due to distinct pathological changes. This review overviews SCI pathophysiology and examines rodent models. It emphasizes model - related challenges, application value, simulation degrees, and replication of pathologies. It also discusses model advantages and limitations, and references recent reverse-engineering projects, which provide a brand-new perspective for promoting SCI research.

Keywords: Animal models; Contusion models; Pathophysiology; Spinal cord injury; Transection models.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Pathophysiological events according to Spinal cord injury (SCI). Demonstration of different phases and sub-classification of secondary phase.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Two main forms of cell death after spinal cord injury.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Sharif-Alhoseini M., Khormali M., Rezaei M., Safdarian M., Hajighadery A., Khalatbari M.M., Safdarian M., Meknatkhah S., Rezvan M., Chalangari M., Derakhshan P., Rahimi-Movaghar V. Animal models of spinal cord injury: a systematic review. Spinal Cord. 2017;55(8):714–721. doi: 10.1038/sc.2016.187. DOI: 10.1038/sc.2016.187. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cheriyan T., Ryan D.J., Weinreb J.H., Cheriyan J., Paul J.C., Lafage V., Kirsch T., Errico T.J. Spinal cord injury models: a review. Spinal Cord. 2014;52(8):588–595. doi: 10.1038/sc.2014.91. DOI: 10.1038/sc.2014.91. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Nishi R.A., Badner A., Hooshmand M.J., Creasman D.A., Liu H., Anderson A.J. The effects of mouse strain and age on a model of unilateral cervical contusion spinal cord injury. PLoS One. 2020;15(6) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234245. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234245. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rat models of spinal cord injury provide valuable insight to understand the mechanism and pathophysiology of spinal cord injury. Curr. Adv. Neurol. Neurol. Disord. 2018 doi: 10.29199/2637-6997/cann-102018. DOI: 10.29199/2637-6997/cann-102018. - DOI
    1. Wathen C.A., Ghenbot Y.G., Ozturk A.K., Cullen D.K., O'Donnell J.C., Petrov D. Porcine models of spinal cord injury. Biomedicines. 2023;11(8) doi: 10.3390/biomedicines11082202. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines11082202. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources