Virtual Acute Shoulder Clinic (VASC): A Safe, Sustainable and Cost-Effective Model
- PMID: 40511350
- PMCID: PMC12151922
- DOI: 10.1007/s43465-024-01311-3
Virtual Acute Shoulder Clinic (VASC): A Safe, Sustainable and Cost-Effective Model
Abstract
Background: Telemedicine growth has rapidly integrated into trauma and orthopaedics through virtual fracture clinics. This study evaluates the impact of implementing a virtual acute shoulder clinic model led by an advanced physiotherapy practitioner (APP) for managing shoulder fractures on clinic re-attendance rates, patient outcomes, and satisfaction.
Methods: A retrospective analysis comparing two groups of sequential patients with shoulder fractures who attended face-to-face settings (Jan 2017-May 2019) versus virtual settings (Jan 2020-May 2022). Departmental and institutional databases were reviewed for relevant data. The Constant-Murley score was used to assess functionality, and satisfaction was assessed using a 4-point Likert score on a 6-month follow-up.
Results: 543 patients were seen in both settings, with 20.54% requiring surgery in the face-to-face and 18.9% in the virtual groups. The mean Constant-Murley scores were 67.17 and 69.28 for the preceded groups, respectively. A statistically significant difference in the Constant-Murley scores (p = 0.002) was observed, albeit below the minimal clinically important difference. At the 6-month follow-up, satisfaction was comparable between the two groups for all management options but higher in the virtual group for patients who underwent surgery (p = 0.001). The clinic achieved total cost savings of £41,400 over 30 months by avoiding unnecessary re-attendance and utilising virtual consultations in place of consultant face-to-face appointments.
Conclusion: The use of telemedicine in the form of a virtual acute shoulder clinic led by APP has shown to deliver comparable functional outcomes and patient satisfaction to conventional face-to-face clinics while being more sustainable and cost-effective.
Level of evidence: Level 3.
Keywords: Clinic; Fracture; Outpatient; Shoulder; Telemedicine; Virtual.
© Crown 2024.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of interestNo potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.
References
-
- Thelwall, C. (2021). A service evaluation after 4 year’s use of the virtual fracture clinic model by a district general hospital in the South West of England. International Journal of Orthopaedic and Trauma Nursing,41, 100798. - PubMed
-
- Boileau, P., Krishnan, S. G., Tinsi, L., Walch, G., Coste, J. S., & Molé, D. (2002). Tuberosity malposition and migration: Reasons for poor outcomes after hemiarthroplasty for displaced fractures of the proximal humerus. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery,11(5), 401–412. - PubMed
-
- Wolf, S., Chitnis, A. S., Manoranjith, A., Vanderkarr, M., Plaza, J. Q., Gador, L. V., Holy, C. E., Sparks, C., & Lambert, S. M. (2022). Surgical treatment, complications, reoperations, and healthcare costs among patients with clavicle fracture in England. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders,23(1), 135. - PMC - PubMed
-
- James, M., Farooq, D., Berntzen, B., Mitra, A., Tasker, A., & Woods, D. (2020). Virtual follow-up clinic for elective shoulder surgery: A safe and cost-effective model. The Bulletin of the Royal College of Surgeons of England,102(7), 333–337.
-
- Bhattacharyya, R., Jayaram, P. R., Holliday, R., Jenkins, P., Anthony, I., & Rymaszewski, L. (2017). The virtual fracture clinic: Reducing unnecessary review of clavicle fractures. Injury,48(3), 720–723. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Research Materials