Effect of Remote Ischemic Preconditioning on Myocardial Injury in Noncardiac Surgery: the PRINCE Randomized Clinical Trial
- PMID: 40511609
- DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.125.075254
Effect of Remote Ischemic Preconditioning on Myocardial Injury in Noncardiac Surgery: the PRINCE Randomized Clinical Trial
Abstract
Background: Major noncardiac surgery carries high rates of postoperative myocardial injury and other complications. Remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) was reported to decrease these complications. However, such supportive evidence lacks robustness.
Methods: In a multinational, double-blind trial, we randomly assigned adult high-risk patients undergoing noncardiac surgical procedures to receive RIPC or sham-RIPC after the induction of general anesthesia and before surgery. RIPC involved three 5-minute ischemic cycles, each followed by 5 minutes of reperfusion, using a blood-pressure cuff inflated to 200 mmHg. The primary endpoint was the rate of myocardial injury defined by an increase in postoperative troponin levels above the highest 99th percentile of reference values. Secondary outcomes included myocardial infarction, stroke, acute kidney injury, need for intensive care unit, length of hospital stay and 30-day all-cause mortality.
Results: We recruited 1213 patients in 25 hospitals and 8 countries. We randomly assigned 599 to RIPC and 614 to sham-RIPC. The most frequent surgical procedures were abdominal and intrathoracic surgeries (406 patients, 33.6%). RIPC was applied to the upper limb in 1,014 patients (84.8%) and to the lower limb in 182 patients (15.2%). Postoperative myocardial injury occurred in 215/566 patients (38.0%) in the RIPC group and in 223/596 patients (37.4%) in the sham-RIPC group (relative risk, 1.02; 95% confidence interval, 0.88 to 1.18; P=0.84). There were no significant differences in the rate of any secondary outcomes. We observed eleven episodes of limb petechiae (10 [1.7%] in the RIPC group vs 1 [0.2%] in the sham-RIPC group) and 34 (6.0%) hospital readmissions in the RIPC group vs 20 (3.5%) in the sham-RIPC group.
Conclusions: Among adult patients undergoing noncardiac surgery, RIPC did not reduce myocardial injury or other postoperative complications.
Similar articles
-
Effect of Delayed Remote Ischemic Preconditioning on Acute Kidney Injury and Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial.Circulation. 2024 Oct 22;150(17):1366-1376. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.124.071408. Epub 2024 Sep 25. Circulation. 2024. PMID: 39319450 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Repeated Episodes of Remote Ischemic Preconditioning for the Prevention of Myocardial Injury in Vascular Surgery.Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2016 Apr;50(3):140-6. doi: 10.1177/1538574416639150. Epub 2016 Apr 12. Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2016. PMID: 27075990 Clinical Trial.
-
The effect of remote ischaemic preconditioning on myocardial injury in emergency hip fracture surgery (PIXIE trial): phase II randomised clinical trial.BMJ. 2019 Dec 4;367:l6395. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l6395. BMJ. 2019. PMID: 31801725 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Effect of Remote Ischaemic preconditioning on Clinical outcomes in patients undergoing Coronary Artery bypass graft surgery (ERICCA study): a multicentre double-blind randomised controlled clinical trial.Southampton (UK): NIHR Journals Library; 2016 Jun. Southampton (UK): NIHR Journals Library; 2016 Jun. PMID: 27359023 Free Books & Documents. Review.
-
Clinical Outcomes of Remote Ischemic Preconditioning Prior to Cardiac Surgery: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 Feb 20;6(2):e004666. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.116.004666. J Am Heart Assoc. 2017. PMID: 28219918 Free PMC article. Review.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
